www.palgrave-journals.com/dam
© 2006 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 1743-6540 $30.00 Vol. 2, 5 219–222 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT 219
THE OPPORTUNITY
In reviewing their 2004 budget and the one
for the upcoming year, General Electric (GE)
determined that in terms of art costs, they could
actually save money if they created a custom image
library that all of the GE businesses around the
world could share. Their initial idea was to employ
13 different photographers in various parts of the
world, take these pictures traditionally and put
them on some sort of CD. But the folks at
BBDO, the people who would come to coordinate
this project, had seen some interesting technology
used on America s Next Top Model that bore
some investigation. I ll get to that in just a
minute.
IN THE OLD DAYS
Imagine if there was no such thing as Digital
Photography or even the internet. Jd Michaels,
VP, Director of Print Services for BBDO
described for me how a project like this used
to be done.
They would have shot fi lm traditionally the fi lm
would have been sent to different labs for each
photographer and some of them were
international photographers so the fi lm would
wind up going to Japan, Germany, Sweden and
Britain. Once the fi lm was developed, a contact
sheet would be made and each photographer
would review those with an agency art director.
The art director would then review the contact
sheet with the account team and then they would
go to the client and make fi nal choices as to
which frames they actually wanted to work
with.
At that point, we would take those frames and
decide what changes we wanted to make to the
frames with a high-resolution scan for digital
purposes. The high-resolution scan would then be
sent via mail all to New York City, where we
would compile them on a server and then one-
by-one begin to go through and re-touch them
with all of the information in the retouching
being sent either through email or over the
telephone.
So everyday there would be a mass mailing
both to and from the agency to get things done.
Now, keep in mind that developing fi lm takes
about 2 days to do at the professional level. All of
the back and forth of the fi lm lead to certain
unavoidable risks, such as losing the fi lm,
damaging the fi lm or not being able to control
Possibilities
Russ Stanton
Before moving into Information Technology, Russ Stanton had developed a professional resume that encompassed radio
production, producing and directing commercials and longer formats for television. He was the recipient of 13 Addy Awards and
one Gabriel Award. In the late 1980s, Russ chose to move away from TV and radio and jump into the IT movement. In IT, he
has successfully developed and managed enterprise business applications for top entertainment and publishing companies and
has produced various interactive learning websites. His two careers merged into one by successfully implementing the Digital
Workfl ow for TV, Print and Radio production at BBDO. Batten, Barton Durstine & Osborn. On a more personal note, Russ enjoys
football, dancing and a good joke. He lives outside of Philadelphia, PA with his wife, two sons and a daughter.
Keywords: GE , BBDO , metadata , Xinet , WebNative , possibilities , successful , digital
Abstract This is a tale of six photographers in 20 cities in almost every continent of
the world, at the same time mind you, taking on the major task of creating a global
photo Library for General Electric. Without giving away too much of the story up front,
let s just say that digital asset management and the internet saved the day because this
was a critical project for both GE and their global creative ad agency BBDO, and had to
be completed in record time. You can only imagine the enormity of such a task, not to
mention the pressure. It s also the story of having the right people in place at the right
time.
Journal of Digital Asset Management (2006) 2, 219 –222 . doi: 10.1057/palgrave.dam.3650035
Russ Stanton
is the Director, Digital
Media Architect,
BBDO North America
Tel: + 212 459 6418
Email: Russ.Stanton@
bbdo.com
Stanton
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT Vol. 2, 5 219–222 © 2006 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 1743-6540 $30.00
220
what would have ended up being, over 300 rolls
of fi lm ying around the world.
The challenge with this project was that it was
slated for 2004. It needed to be completed by the
1st of January and we started this basically in
August of 2004. Doing it the oldway was not an
option.
HOW D THEY DO THAT?
In brainstorming on exactly how this project
would get done in the time frame required, Jd s
group thought of many things. Some of the things
included having a central lab in Europe do all the
lm processing or having day and night shifts to
handle submissions around the clock, given issues
with various time zones. He continues
That meeting just precipitated tears and headaches.
So after the end of that we went back to our own
offi ces and at about the exact same time we each
met in the hall and said, Oh my Gosh!! We could
use that Xinet thing and we ll do the photography
digitally.
Xinet is a suite of products dedicated to pre-
press, workfl ows and digital asset management.
One of the main attributes that captured Jd s
group s attention though was the uploader /
downloader functionality that allows for the
transfer of fi les over the internet and the
ingestion into the Xinet system.
The uploader is almost an applet , Jd said, a specifi c
program that sits on the desktop of a PC or a
Mac that allows you to drag and drop images
directly from your desktop connected at high-
speed anywhere in the world into our fi rewall
protected server.
The trick was could we program the applet to
put them in a specifi c place and tag them with
XMP data (metadata)? This would allow us to sort
through them in any number of ways on the
database without having to have someone here
to administer every photo that came in.
The answer was yes. The images go into this
applet, they are instantly tagged, stuffed or zipped,
transmitted, unstuffed on the other end and placed
in the correct folder for each photographer. Once
they open on the Xinet server, previews are
instantly made and it is searchable both by its
name, its location, and its XMP metadata instantly.
So if we wanted to search for the import date in
the date fi eld, we got to see all the things that
had come in for that date. But could it get
implemented in time?
Jd continues
Because our groups were considerably smaller
and they were a regional team we had to pull
from various groups. So, we had the IT person
who was excited about trying to pull the
technology together and making sure it didn t
confl ict with anything else. You had Kari Nouhan,
who was the art person, who was very excited
about being able to get all the images in and
making sure that they were a high enough quality
in terms of making sure the digital photography
was there. You had myself who wanted to make
sure that when they came in, we could organize
them and get them from place to place. And then
we had Alaina Collins, who was very excited
about programming it and making sure everything
was running smoothly from a moment-to-
moment basis.
By having all of us together as a fi rst team, the
only ramp-up we needed was that all 4 of us
came together and understood what was going
on, because we had taken, responsibility for the
project working.
THE LOGISTICS
So after some discussions with the Xinet
integrator, NAPC (New America Platinotype
Corporation) we decided to give it a shot. We
still didn t have the kind of time that you d
typically require for this undertaking, but we had
made a commitment. So, we had to streamline
everything and make every moment count
.
NAPC gave us specifi c training for 2 days on
how to set this project up educating us on skills
we needed to know to create uploaders, create
actions on the server, create a hierarchy on the
server, make new volumes, naming conventions,
tag the information correctly (metadata) and
administer names and passwords.
Once we got those lessons down, then we
were able to work the program and make it
actually do what we wanted it to do. So we
really created a machine, and that s all we
wanted to know about it.
As time went on, we realized the production
people could work from home saving more
A true success story in digital photography and asset management
© 2006 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 1743-6540 $30.00 Vol. 2, 5 219–222 JOURNAL OF DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT 221
time. They could work from anywhere and do
complete administration of any fi le through the
administration feature.
The amazing part is that all this happened in
a 2 week period; a record implementation
according to NAPC. Jd Michaels says,
They only sold us the system because we made
a solemn promise that we were going to take
complete responsibility for this and not expect
them to staff us with someone. We just had the
right combination of people to make that happen.
It s just a box, but it s a box that responds
extremely well to enthusiasm and ideas. That s
the greatest thing about it.
So, off we went creating uploaders for each
photographer, pre-programming the folders
into the uploaders. Each photographer shot
the equivalent of over 2 3 rolls every day and
there was 4 6 weeks of shooting depending
on where the photographer was in the schedule.
All total there were over 15 thousand
images before all the choices were made. We
ended up with 800 prime images that they
use, with another 400 that were considered
seconds. But the 800 that we had were
retouched and put together and color-corrected
uniformly.
The client could even see the previews
online and they would say, those 4 don t have
the angle we want its that one so we saved a
great deal of time and a great deal in prints,
which kept their cost lower.
The client became so used to the WebNative
interface, that after awhile, we were able to have
them review the pictures at their own site with
their own computer.
The art director would be here on the phone
or they could go on and choose the ones they
wanted and as they chose the ones they wanted,
we could go on and then look at the basket that
they had made and then say OK these are the
ones that they want. It started being a really fun
way or working.
THE IMPORTANCE OF DAM IN
ALL THIS
In the beginning, the digital asset management
piece was the one thing that was simply the way
that they found the few images that really
needed to be retouched and moved, out of 300
images per day. So the initial metadata was fi le
name and photographer plus the day that it was
put into the system. The initial fi elds that were
put in were very simple.
A lot of it came out of PhotoShop. The
cameras that they were using gave a great deal
of information instantly and just came right into
the database through the XMP data. So they
really only needed to put those custom fi elds in
so that they could search. Jd continues,
When we had the fi nal images, we went into
them and then custom tagged them to who shot
them, where they were shot, also, the client gave
us metadata they wanted added in for businesses
that each one represented or the angle they
wanted to put on it so that their people could
nd it easier.
When we needed to add fi elds specifi c to the
client, that s when we manually added it.
Everything else we had worked to make sure
elds were basic and NAPC worked to make sure
that their program was going to work to pull the
images in the right place and then make sure that
all the metadata that was involved was in the fi le.
Also, a comfort was the fact that our IT guys had
everything backed up and protected behind our
rewall with only limited access from outside.
Otherwise, this would have been impossible as
well. We had to make sure that these million-
dollar images, oating in cyberspace, were
protected, and that the system was redundant so
that if it went down, it could come up quickly
with no time lost.
AT THE END OF THE DAY
According to Jd, If Xinet was a solution tool
that gave you a workfl ow that was preplanned, it
would have been useless, because we didn t need
a solution, we needed a tool that they could
build something with.
We needed a Lowes, where we could just go in
and pick stuff and build something. That s what
this was like for us.
The mixture of relief and pride was truly
legendary with all of us. We had never gotten to
work with a technology before that was so up in
the air. It was like a box of crayons. The box of
Stanton
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT Vol. 2, 5 219–222 © 2006 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 1743-6540 $30.00
222
crayons doesn t tell you what to draw with it, and
this was what this was like. Normally, everything
comes with directions, instructions or even
suggestions, but it worked with out imaginations.
What I learned was that you can take pretty
high-end technology and with good people that
understand the basics of each aspect, put together
a super group that just enjoys making things work
and enjoys seeing things happen.
I think that I really learned in business, the
boldness of your plan and your players is directly
correlated to your success. Anybody could have
bought the software, anybody could have said,
we re going to do it , but the boldness of not
being afraid of an 800 page manual, just speaks to
the type of people between BBDO and GE. That
boldness is what really made the project work to
the client; to say
OK this is going to be fi ne with
us
. It was extremely successful, I was extremely
proud of it.
At the end of the day, going back to the old
way of doing things as I have described earlier is
now never an option, not only because of the
time, although that was major. But, according to
Jd, if we had done it the old way it would have
cost 4 ½ times as much. Now that is the kind of
success you can literally take to the bank.