of the PLA2G6 variant indicates that screening of Papil-
lons intended for breeding is still recommended to avoid
unintentional production of puppies with infantile NAD.
Background
Hereditary neuropathies in dogs frequently present at an
early age and are generally progressive and fatal. Such dis-
eases have been reported in numerous dog breeds (Online
Mendelian Inheritance in Animals, OMIA) [1]. Identifica-
tion of a causative mutation for these genetic diseases al-
lows for a precise diagnosis, and can provide initial insight
into therapeutic strategies that may prevent or reduce dis-
ease progression. As such, companion animals with her-
editary diseases can serve as translational large animal
models to investigate the potential safety and efficacy of
novel treatments for human disease. However, screening
and informed breeding are pivotal to reduce the wide-
spread occurrence of disease-associated allelic variants in
future generations of companion dogs.
Neuroaxonal dystrophy (NAD) represents a group of auto-
somal recessive degenerative neuropathies characterized
histopathologically by ‘spher oids’ in the central nervous sys-
tem and caused by one of a few dysfunctional genes in
humans [2] and various animal species including dogs [1, 3].
In humans, variants in the phospholipase A2 group VI
(PLA2G6) gene, which encodes a calcium-independ ent en-
zyme essential for membrane integrity, cause PLA2G6-asso-
ciated neurodegeneration (PLAN) [4, 5].
An infantile NAD (OMIA #: 002105–9615) was first
identified in Papillion dogs in 1995 [6–11]. Clinical man-
ifestations of ataxia, head tremor, difficulty rising, dis-
cordant gate, limb extension, paresis, inability to
prehend food and water, and blindness are observed by
1–3 months of age. Axonal spheroids are found through-
out the central nervous system but not in any peripheral
nerves, and no iron accumulation was noted [7, 8, 11].
Because clinical signs are rapid and progressive, natural
death occurs at a few months of age if not prece ded by
humane euthanasia. In the absence of a genetic test to
identify carriers of this disease, breeders have excluded
any Papillon parents and littermates of affected puppies
from breeding to reduce the risk of producing affected
puppies. Recently, a homozygous missense variant (XM_
022424454.1:c.1579G > A) in PLA2G6 gene was identi-
fied in three Papillons with NAD in Japan [11]. In this
report, we tested archived samples from Papillons with a
clinicopathological diagnosis of NAD for the presence of
the PLA2G6 missense variant and provide results of an
initial genotyping survey of Papillons from North Amer-
ica and Europe.
Materials and methods
The Section of Medical Genetics and PennGen Labora-
tories had stored samples from four Papillons clinically
diagnosed with NAD prior to 2015. These samples, as
well as samples from their relatives, were analyzed for
the published PLA2G6 missense variant [11]. Based
upon the results, PennGen started to offer a genotyping
assay for the PLA2G6 variant in late 2015. Either cheek
swab or EDTA blood samples were accepted for geno-
typing. Genomic DNA was extracted using QIAamp
Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A TaqMan
genotyping assay, as previously described [11], was used
to determine the genotypes.
Results and discussion
The TaqMan genotyping assay for the XM_022424454.1:
c.1579G > A variant in PLA2G6 readily differentiated the
three genotypes. The four Papillons clinically affected
with NAD were homozygous for the PLA2G6 variant,
while samples from non-affected dogs were either
homozygous for the wild-type allele or heterozygous for
the previously published pathogenic variant [11].
Between October 2015 and December 2017, samples
from 660 Papillons were received from North America
and Europe (Table 1). Only three puppies homozygous
for the pathogenic variant were found, with one each
from USA, Canada, and Europe. All three Papillon pup-
pies were clinically affected. The low number of af-
fecteds is likely due to the fact that Papillon breeders are
well aware of the typical clinical signs of NAD and may
not feel the need to submit a sample for testing to con-
firm their presumptive diagnosis. Among the 660 dogs,
17.5% were heterozygous.
When the genotype screening test became available in
late 2015, the demand was large and many breeders were
interested in knowing if their Papillon was a carrier. In-
deed, 79.5% of all requests indicated breeding and/or gen-
eral screening as the reason for testing. Following
screening, breeders were immediately able to avoid produ-
cing affecteds by mating clear (wild type; GG) to clear or
clear to carrier (heterozygote; GA). While biased, the abil-
ity to undertake more selective breeding appeared to re-
sult in a decline in variant allele frequency within the first
3 years of screening (Table 2). As such, screening can help
reduce the proportion of carriers in the population, reduce
the need for future testing, and permit the breeding of
many Papillons, particularly close relatives of an affected
puppy that would not have been bred in the absence of
testing in order to reduce potential disease risk.
As of late 2017, additional laboratories now offer the
test, resulting in a dramatic reduction in the number of
samples received by PennGen (only 14 Papillons with 5
carriers over the next 2 years). As of 2020, at least 10 la-
boratories worldwide (listed by the World Small Animal
Veterinary Association, a web resource on DNA tests for
hereditary diseases) offer genotyping for this variant as a
specific test and/or as part of Papillon breed panel
Raj and Giger Canine Medicine and Genetics (2020) 7:17 Page 2 of 4