
includes all funds operating the whole period
between July 1994 and December 2004.
We find significant asymmetry in biweekly
return distributions in 74 of the 85 portfolios
analysed — this represents a problem when
employing common total risk measures such as
variance or standard deviation, which require
symmetric return distributions to be valid for
general investor preferences. Moreover, we
observe that a subset of the investment funds in
the sample do not attain the average return
corresponding to risk-free assets, a situation
which also leads to anomalies in the performance
rankings resulting from measurements such as
Sharpe’s Ratio or Treynor’s Index.
In order to avoid the two aforementioned
theoretical issues, alternative performance
indices are proposed in the empirical study,
which on the one hand, include risk
measurements such as semi-standard deviation or
absolute deviation and, on the other, approach
the return premium in a relative sense.
The calculated performance rankings resulting
from the application of all the measurements
considered, however, barely differ from one
another. What this suggests is that despite the
anomalies described above, the traditional
performance metrics to be applied. While this
could be a signal that investor preferences are
generally mean–variance in nature, a more plausible
explanation is that the market has matured quite
rapidly and — much faster than some emerging
markets areas — has reached a level where tools for
analysis should be based on those tools applied in
the world’s most sophisticated markets.
DISCLAIMER
We stress that the opinions stated in this paper
exclusively reflect the view of the author and are
not those of Mercer Oliver Wyman.
References
1 Sharpe W.F. (1966) ‘Mutual Fund Performance’, Journal
of Business, Vol. 39, pp. 119–138.
2 Treynor J.L. (1965) ‘How to Rate Management of
Investment Funds’, Harvard Business Review, January-
February, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 63–75.
3 Jensen M.C. (1968) ‘The Performance of Mutual Funds in the
Period 1945–1964’, JournalofFinance, Vol. 23, pp. 389–416.
4 Damant D., Hwang S. and Satchell S. (2000) ‘Using a
Model of Integrated Risk to Assess U.K. Asset Allocation’,
Applied Mathematical Finance, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 127–152.
5 Eftekhari B., Pedersen C.S. and Satchell S.E. (2000)
‘On the Volatility of Measures of Financial Risk: An
Investigation Using Returns from European Markets’,
The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 6, pp. 18–38.
6 Konno H. and Shirakawa H. (1994) ‘Equilibrium
Relations in a Capital Asset Market: A Mean–Absolute
Deviation Approach’, Financial Engineering and the
Japanese Markets, Vol. 1, pp. 21–35.
7 Okunev J. (1990) ‘An Alternative Measure of Mutual
Fund Performance’, Journal of Business Finance and
Accounting, Vol. 17, pp. 247–264.
8 Pedersen C. and Satchell S. (2000) ‘Small Sample
Analysis of Performance Measures in the Asymmetric
Response Model’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative
Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 425–450.
9 Pedersen C.S. and Satchell S.E. (2002) ‘On the
Foundations of Performance Measures under Asymmetric
Returns’, Quantitative Finance, Vol. 3, pp. 217–223.
10 Sortino F.A. and Price L.N. (1994) ‘Performance
Measurement in a Downside Risk Framework’, Journal
of Investing, Fall, pp. 59–72.
11 Damant D. and Satchell S. (1996) ‘Downside Risk:
Modern Theories; Stop-and Start Again’, Professional
Investor, May-June, pp. 12–18.
12 Hwang S. and Pedersen C. (2002) ‘On Empirical Risk
Measurement with Asymmetric Return Distributions
Financial Econometrics Research Centre Working Paper
WP02-07, City University Business School, London.
13 Eftekhari B. and Satchell S. (1996) ‘Non-normality of
Returns in Emerging Markets’, Research in International
Business and Finance (Suppl 1), pp. 267–277.
14 Pedersen C. (2001) ‘Derivatives and Downside Risk’,
Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation, Vol. 7, No. 3,
pp. 251–268.
15 Ang A.J.Chen and Xing Y. (2005) ‘Downside Risk’,
AFA Meeting, 7–9 January, Philadelphia, PA.
16 Hyung N. and De Vries C.G. (2004) ‘Portfolio
Diversification Effects of Downside RiskTinbergen
Institute Discussion Paper TI 05-008/2.
17 Campbell R. and Kraeussl R. (2005) ‘Revisiting the
Home Bias Puzzle: Downside Equity RiskWorking
Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/
abstract=802704.
Performance metrics for Spanish investment funds 223