ISSN 0021-3640, JETP Letters.
c
Pleiades Publishing, Inc.,
Universal T/B Scaling Behavior of Heavy Fermion Compounds
(Mini-review)
V. R. Shaginyan
+1)
, A.Z.Msezane
, J.W.Clark
×◦
, G.S.Japaridze
, Y.S.Leevik
+
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, 188300 Gatchina, Russia
Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA
×
McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences & Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
Centro de Investiga¸c˜aoemMatem´atica e Aplica¸c˜oes, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
National Research University Higher School of Economics, 194100 St. Petersburg, Russia
Submitted 5 October 2020
Resubmitted 23 October 2020
Accepted 24 October 2020
In our mini-review, we address manifestations of T/B scaling behavior of heavy-fermion (HF) compounds,
where T and B are respectively temperature and magnetic field. Using experimental data and the fermion
condensation theory, we show that this scaling behavior is typical of HF compounds including HF metals,
quasicrystals, and quantum spin liquids. We demonstrate that such scaling behavior holds down to the lowest
temperature and field values, so that T/B varies in a wide range, provided the HF compound is located near
the topological fermion condensation quantum phase transition (FCQPT). Due to the topological properties of
FCQPT, the effective mass M
exhibits a universal behavior, and diverges as T goes to zero. Such a behavior
of M
has important technological applications. We also explain how to extract the universal scaling behavior
from experimental data collected on different heavy-fermion compounds. As an example, we consider the HF
metal YbCo
2
Ge
4
, and show that its scaling behavior is violated at low temperatures. Our results obtained
show good agreement with experimental facts.
DOI: 10.1134/S0021364020220026
Introduction. Topological approach is a powerful
method to gain information about a wide class of physi-
cal systems. Knowledge of the topological properties al-
lows us to improve a general knowledge about physical
systems without solving specific equations, which de-
scribe concrete systems and are often very complicated.
As usually, the microscopic approach to a heavy fermion
(HF) metal (for example, computer simulations) gives
only particular information about specific solids, but not
about universal features, inherent in the wide class of
HF compounds. HF compounds can be viewed as the
new state of matter, since their behavior near the topo-
logical fermion condensation quantum phase transition
(FCQPT) acquire important similarities, making them
universal. The idea of this phase transition, forming ex-
perimentally discovered flat bands, started long ago,
in 1990 [1–3]. At first, this idea seemed to be a curi-
ous mathematical exercise, and now it is proved to be
rapidly expanding field with uncountable applications
[1–9].
1)
e-mail: vrshag@thd.pnpi.spb.ru
The scaling behavior of HF compounds is a challeng-
ing problem of condensed matter physics [6, 10–13]. It
is generally assumed that scaling with respect to T/B
(temperature-magnetic field ratio) is related to a quan-
tum critical point (QCP) that represents the endpoint
of a phase transition being tuned to T =0by such con-
trol parameters as magnetic field, pressure, and compo-
sition of the heavy-fermion compounds. As soon as the
tuned endpoint of the phase transition reaches T =0,
it becomes a quantum phase transition (QPT). At QCP
involved quantum fluctuations like valence, magnetism,
etc. can take place and influence on the properties of
system in question [11, 12]. Fluctuations can also oc-
cur at second-order phase transitions, but in all cases
the temperature range of these fluctuations is very nar-
row [14]; in contrast, T/B scaling can span a few or-
ders of magnitude in T/B [6–8]. An attendant problem
to be addressed by theory stems from the experimen-
tal finding that scaling behavior can take place without
both QCP realization and effective mass M
divergence
[12]. The divergence of effective mass M
at T 0
is of crucial importance for understanding technologi-
JETP Letters 1
2 V.R.Shaginyan, A.Z.Msezane, J.W.Clark, G.S.Japaridze, Y.S.Leevik
cal applications of quantum materials. For example, the
divergence leads to the high heat capacity C of quan-
tum material, while under the application of magnetic
field both M
and C diminishes. As a result, one can
exploit this property constructing low temperature re-
frigerators. To solve these problems, one needs to have
a reliable theoretical framework for analysis of experi-
mental facts related to the scaling behavior.
A universal T/B scaling behavior is generated by
quasiparticles belonging to flat bands. These flat bands
can be preformed by van Hove singularities and finally
formed by inter-particle interaction generating topologi-
cal FCQPT [15]. In narrow electronic bands in which the
Coulomb interaction energy becomes comparable to the
bandwidth, interactions drive the topological FCQPT;
as a result, at T =0flat bands are emerged, see e.g. [6–
8, 15]. Such flat bands in twisted graphene have been ex-
perimentally observed, see, e.g. [3]. Thus, we can safely
use the model of homogeneous HF liquid, since we con-
sider a behavior controlled by flat bands and related
to the scaling of quantities such as the effective mass,
heat capacity, magnetization, etc. As a result, the scal-
ing properties are defined by momentum transfers that
are small compared to momenta of the order of the recip-
rocal lattice length. The high momentum contributions
can therefore be ignored by substituting the lattice for
the jelly model; this observation is in a good agreement
with experimental facts collected on many HF metals
[6, 7, 9]. In our case quasiparticles are well defined ex-
citations, see, e.g. [6, 7, 16], and the divergence of the
effective mass M
is not related to Z 0 (as it is can
be assumed, see, e.g. [17]), where Z is the quasiparti-
cle amplitude. The divergence is defined by both the
emergence of an extended van Hove singularities, pre-
forming flat bands, and the Coulomb interaction, giv-
ing rise to strong correlations; as a result, at T =0the
electronic dispersion becomes flat at the chemical po-
tential μ, topologically transforming the Fermi surface
into Fermi volume, see e.g. [1, 6, 7, 9, 15, 18–20].
In our mini-review, we show that the fermion con-
densation (FC) theory, which entails the topological
FCQPT, provides the appropriate framework for de-
scribing and analyzing the universal scaling behavior of
HF compounds [1, 2, 4–7, 9]. We predict that T/B scal-
ing behavior can be observed in a wide range of T/B
values, provided the given HF compound is located near
a topological FCQPT. Violation of T/B scaling at the
lowest values of T/B is a signal that the given HF com-
pound is situated before the topological FCQPT on the
T B phase diagram, and hence exhibits Landau Fermi-
Liquid (LFL) behavior at sufficiently low temperatures.
We consider the HF metal YbCo
2
Ge
4
,andshowthat
its scaling behavior is violated at low temperatures. The
results of the FC theory are in good agreement with ex-
perimental observations collected on different strongly
correlated Fermi systems like HF metals, quasicrystals
and quantum magnets, holding quantum spin liquids
[6,7,9].Asaresult,theFCtheoryisusefultoolwhen
projecting technological applications of quantum mate-
rials representing by HF compounds.
Scaling behavior of the effective mass near the
topological FCQPT. One of the main experimental
manifestations of the topological FCQPT phenomenon
is the scaling behavior of the physical properties of HF
compounds located near such a phase transition. To un-
derstand this scaling behavior on a sound theoretical
basis, we begin with a brief description of the associ-
ated behavior exhibited by the effective mass M
in
the framework of a homogeneous HF liquid [6]. This
simplification avoids the complications associated with
the anisotropy of solids and focuses of both the ther-
modynamic properties and the non-Fermi-liquid (NFL)
behavior by calculating the effective mass M
(T,B) as
a function of temperature T and magnetic field B [6–8],
based on the Landau formula for the quasiparticle effec-
tive mass M
(T,H). The only modification introduced
is that the effective mass is no longer approximately
constant but now depends on temperature, magnetic
field, and other parameters such as pressure, etc. We
note that the FC theory is a good established theory
based on the density functional theory; in that case,
the Landau functional E[n(p)] and the corresponding
Eq. (1) are also derived in the same frameworks, there-
fore, being exact, see e.g. [6, 7, 9, 18, 4]. Here n(p) is
the quasiparticle distribution function.
At finite temperatures and magnetic fields, Landau’s
equation takes the form [6, 8, 21, 22]
1
M
σ
(T,H)
=
1
M
+ (1)
+
σ
1
p
F
p
p
3
F
F
σ,σ
1
(p
F
, p)
∂n
σ
1
(p,T,H)
∂p
dp
(2π)
3
in terms of n
σ
(p) and the quasiparticle interaction
F
σ
1
2
.HereM can be represented by the bare elec-
tron mass or by the enhanced bare like mass at van
Hove singularity. The single-particle spectrum ε(p,T)
is a variational derivative
ε
σ
(p)=
δE[n(p)]
δn
σ
(p)
, (2)
of the system energy E[n
σ
(p)] with respect to the quasi-
particle distribution (or occupation numbers) n
σ
(p for
JETP Letters
Universal T/B Sca ling Behavior of Heavy Fermion Compounds 3
spin σ, which in turn is related to the spectrum ε
σ
(p)
by
n
σ
(p,T)=
1+exp
(ε(p,T) μ
σ
)
T

1
. (3)
In our case, the chemical potential μ depends on spin
due to the Zeeman splitting, μ
σ
= μ ± μ
B
B,whereμ
B
is the Bohr magneton. The magnetic field B appears in
Eq. (3) via the ratio μ
σ
/T =(μ ± μ
B
B)/T .Wenote
that (1) and (2) are exact equations [7, 18]. In our case,
the Landau interaction F is fixed by the condition that
the system is situated at a FCQPT. Its sole purpose is
to bring the system to the topological FCQPT point,
where M
→∞at T =0and B =0, altering the
topology of the Fermi surface, transforming it to a vol-
ume such that the effective mass acquires temperature
and field dependence [6, 21, 23]. Provided the Landau
interaction is an analytic function, at the Fermi surface
the momentum-dependent part of the Landau interac-
tion can be parameterized as a truncated power series
F = aq
2
+ bq
3
+ cq
4
+ ...,whereq = p
1
p
2
,thevari-
ables p
1
and p
2
are momenta, and a, b,andc are fitting
parameters defined by the condition that the system is
at a FCQPT point.
Direct inspection of Eq. (1) shows that at T =0and
B =0, the sum of the first and second terms on the
right side vanishes, since 1/M
(T 0) goes to zero
when the system is located at the FCQPT point. Given
a Landau interaction analytic with respect to momenta
variables, at finite T the right side of Eq. (1) is propor-
tional F
(M
)
2
T
2
,whereF
is the first derivative of
F (q) with respect to q at q 0. Results for the cor-
responding integrals can be found in textbooks see
especially [24]. At any rate, we have 1/M
(M
)
2
T
2
and arrive at [6, 7]
M
(T ) a
T
T
2/3
. (4)
At finite temperatures, application of a magnetic field
μ
B
B k
B
T drives the system to the LFL regime with
M
(B) a
B
B
2/3
, (5)
where a
T
and a
B
are parameters and k
B
the Boltz-
mann constant. It follows from Eq. (5) that heat capac-
ity C M
(B)T of quantum materials strongly de-
pends on B, this property can be used when projecting
e.g. low temperatures refrigerators.
If the system is still located before the FCQPT, the
effective mass is finite M
= M
0
,andEq.(5)mustbe
adjusted, since at B 0 the effective mass M
does
not diverge; thus
M
(B) a
B
(B
0
+ B)
2/3
. (6)
From Eq. (6) it follows that at B 0 the effective mass
becomes M
0
. Therefore, when B B
0
, the effective
mass M
depends on the magnetic field in accordance
with Eq. (5), since the contribution coming from B de-
fines the behavior of M
.Asaresult,atB B
0
we
can replace Eq. (5) by the equivalent equation
M
(B) M
0
+ a
B
B
2/3
. (7)
In the case of the HF liquid, these observations allow
for construction of an approximate solution of Eq. (1)
in the form M
= M
(B,T) that satisfies both Eqs. (4)
and (5). Introduction of “internal” scales simplifies the
problem under consideration, allowing us to eliminate
the microscopic structure of the HF compounds under
consideration [6, 7]. To establish such “internal” scales,
we observe that near the FCQPT, the effective mass
M
(B,T) reaches a maximum M
M
at a certain tem-
perature T
M
B. (See later comments on Eqs. (3) and
(5) and Fig. 1). To conveniently measure the effective
Fig. 1. (Color online) Scaling behavior of the dimensionless
effective mass M
N
versus dimensionless variable (T/B)
N
.
Scaling of thermodynamic properties is defined by M
N
;
see Eq. (15). M
N
is a function of T
N
(T/B)
N
(T/B)/(T/B)
M
, as it follows from Eq. (14). Solid curve
depicts the scaling behavior M
N
versus normalized tem-
perature T
N
as a function of magnetic field, given by
Eqs. (8) and (12). Clearly, at finite T
N
< 1 the normal
Fermi liquid regime is realized. At T
N
1 the system
enters a crossover state, and at growing temperatures ex-
hibits NFL behavior. The LFL, crossover, inflection point,
and NFL behavior are indicated by the arrows. The LFL
behavior is additionally shown by the hatched area
mass and temperature versus magnetic field B,wein-
troduce the scales M
M
and T
M
, generating new vari-
ables M
N
= M
/M
M
(normalized effective mass) and
T
N
= T/T
M
(normalized temperature). In the vicinity
JETP Letters
4 V.R.Shaginyan, A.Z.Msezane, J.W.Clark, G.S.Japaridze, Y.S.Leevik
of FCQPT, the normalized effective mass M
N
(T
N
) is
well approximated by a universal function [6, 7]
M
N
(T
N
) c
0
1+c
1
T
2
N
1+c
2
T
8/3
N
. (8)
Here, T
N
= T/T
M
T/B (see Fig. 1) and c
0
=
=(1+c
2
)/(1 + c
1
),withc
1
and c
2
free parameters.
We stress that values of M
M
and T
M
are defined by
the microscopic structure of the HF compound under
study, while the normalized values M
N
and T
N
demon-
strate the universal scaling exhibited by HF compounds
located near the topological FCQPT, since this scaling
is determined by the nature of both the phase transition
and the model of homogeneous HF liquid; we note that
these observations are in good agreement with experi-
mental facts collected on HF compounds, see e.g. [6–9].
From Equations (5) and (8) it follows that
M
M
B
2/3
T
2/3
M
; T/B T/T
N
. (9)
The Landau interaction F
σ,σ
1
(q) appearing in Eq. (1)
can produce the characteristic topological form of the
spectrum ε(p) μ (p p
b
)
2
(p p
F
),with(p
b
<p
F
)
and (p
F
p
b
)/p
F
1, leading to M
T
1/2
and
creating a quantum critical point [25]. The same crit-
ical point is generated by the interaction F (q) as rep-
resented by a non-analytic but integrable-over-x func-
tion with q =
p
2
1
+ p
2
2
2xp
1
p
2
and F (q 0) →∞
[6,4,8].BothcasesleadtoM
T
1/2
,andEq.(4)
becomes
M
(T ) a
T
T
1/2
. (10)
Inthesameway,weobtain
M
(B) a
B
B
1/2
, (11)
in terms of parameters a
T
and a
B
.
Taking into account the fact that Eq. (10) leads to a
spiky density of states (DOS), with the spiky character
fading away under increasing temperature as observed
in quasicrystals [26–28], we note that the general form
of ε(p) produces the behavior of M
given by Eqs. (10)
and (11). This is realized in quasicrystals, which can be
viewed as a generalized form of common crystals [26].
We note further that the behavior 1/M
χ
1
T
1/2
is in good agreement with the behavior χ
1
T
0.51
observed experimentally in quasicrystals [28, 26]. Our
result 1/M
T
1/2
is consistent with the robustness of
the exponent 0.51 under hydrostatic pressure [28]. This
robustness is guaranteed by the unique singular density
of states associated with the topological FCQPT, which
survives under application of pressure [26–30]. To de-
velop the consequences of the the solution of Eq. (1) at
finite B and T near the FCQPT, we construct an ap-
proximate solution by interpolating between the LFL
behavior described by Eq. (11) and the NFL behavior
described by Eq. (10), that models the universal scaling
behavior M
N
(T
N
T/B) [26]
M
N
(T
N
) c
0
1+c
1
T
2
N
1+c
2
T
5/2
N
, (12)
with c
0
=(1+c
2
)/(1 + c
1
) and c
1
, c
2
as fitting param-
eters. Taking into account Eqs. (11) and (12), we arrive
at
M
M
B
1/2
T
1/2
M
. (13)
It follows from Eqs. (3), (8), and (12) that
T
M
B; T
N
=
T
T
M
=
T
a
1
μ
B
B
T
B
T
B
N
. (14)
Here a
1
is a dimensionless factor, μ
B
is the Bohr mag-
neton, (T/B)
N
=(T/B)/(T/B)
M
,where(T/B)
M
is
the point at which M
N
reaches it maximum value
M
N
=1, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Expression (14) shows
that Eqs. (8) and (12) determine the effective-mass scal-
ing in terms of T/B as well. We conclude from Eq. (14)
that since T
M
B, the curves M
N
(T,B) merge into a
single curve M
N
(T
N
= T/B),withT
N
= T/T
M
T/B,
demonstrating the widespread scaling in HF metals (for
example, see [6, 7]). Such behavior is depicted in Fig. 1.
We note that Eqs. (8) and (14) allow us to describe the
behavior of the strongly correlated quantum spin liquid
(SCQSL) existing in different frustrated magnets [6, 7].
Another important feature of the FC state is that
apart from the fact that the Landau quasiparticle ef-
fectively acquires strong dependence on external factors
such as the temperature and magnetic field, all the fun-
damental relations inherent in the LFL approach remain
formally intact. In particular, the famous LFL relation
[22, 24, 6, 7],
M
(B,T) χ(B, T)
C(B, T)
T
, (15)
still holds. That is, expression (15) is also valid in
the case of HF compounds located near a topological
FCQPT, where the specific heat C, magnetic suscepti-
bility χ, and effective mass M
depend on T and B.
Based on Eq. (15), we find that the normalized values
of C/T and χ are of the form [6, 7]
M
N
(B,T)=χ
N
(B,T)=
C(B, T)
T
N
. (16)
Thus, Equation (16) allows us to reveal the universal
scaling behavior of different HF compounds located near
JETP Letters
Universal T/B Sca ling Behavior of Heavy Fermion Compounds 5
the topological FCQPT like HF metals, frustrated insu-
lators with SCQSL, quasicrystals, 2D liquids, etc., see,
e.g. [6, 9]. It is also seen from Eq. (16) that the aforemen-
tioned thermodynamic properties have the same scaling
behavior as depicted in Fig. 1. Moreover, we shall see
below that the thermodynamic properties of HF met-
als, SCQSL of frustrated magnets, and the other HF
compounds exhibit the same typical behavior. Based
on Eq. (8) and Fig. 1, we can construct the general
schematic T B phase diagram of SCQSL, reported
in Fig. 2. We assume here that at T =0and B =0the
Fig. 2. (Color online) Schematic T B phase diagram of a
HF compound, with magnetic field B as control param-
eter. The hatched area corresponds to the crossover do-
main at T
M
(B), given by Eq. (14). At fixed magnetic field
and elevated temperature (vertical arrow) there is a LFL-
NFL crossover. The horizontal arrow indicates a NFL-
LFL transition at fixed temperature and elevated mag-
netic field. The topological FCQPT (shown in the panel)
occurs at T =0and B =0,whereM
diverges
system is approximately located at a FCQPT point. At
fixed temperature the system is driven by the magnetic
field B along the horizontal arrow (from the NFL to
the LFL parts of the phase diagram). At fixed B and
elevated T the system moves from the LFL to the NFL
regime along the vertical arrow. The hatched area in-
dicating the crossover between LFL and NFL phases
separates the NFL state from the paramagnetic slightly
polarized LFL state. The crossover temperature T
M
(B)
is given by Eq. (14).
T/B scaling in heavy fermion compounds. The
experimentally based scaling behavior of M
N
so de-
rived is displayed in Fig. 1. Explanation of this scaling,
M
N
(T
N
) C(B, T)/T , presents a serious challenge to
theories of the HF compounds. Most of the current theo-
ries analyze only the critical exponents that characterize
M
N
(T
N
) at T
N
1 and thus consider only a part of
the problem, missing the LFL and the transition regime
[6, 7, 13]. This scaling behavior of the effective mass
M
N
of HF compounds (or strongly correlated Fermi sys-
tems) is described by Eqs. (8) and (12). It follows then
from Eqs. (15) and (16) that their experimentally ob-
served thermodynamic properties express the universal
scaling behavior revealed by our analysis.
In the present context, the HF compounds are taken
to represent strongly correlated Fermi sytems as realized
in HF metals, high-T
c
superconductors, quasicrystals,
SCQSL of frustrated magnets and two-dimensional liq-
uids like
3
He. One can expect that HF compounds with
their extremely diverse composition and microscopic
structure would demonstrate very different thermody-
namic, transport, and relaxation properties. To reveal
the universal scaling behavior of HF compounds, irre-
spective of specific properties of individual compounds,
we have introduced internal scales to measure the corre-
sponding thermodynamic properties, as is done when we
consider the scaling behavior of the effective mass M
.
This uniform behavior arises from the fact that HF com-
pounds are located near a topological FCQPT, gener-
ating their uniform scaling behavior with respect to the
effective mass M
[6, 31, 9] (see Fig. 1). As an example,
Fig. 3 displays the universal T/B scaling behavior of the
HF metal CeCu
6x
Au
x
and SCQSL of the frustrated
insulator herbertsmithite ZnCu
3
(OH)
6
Cl
2
[32, 33]. The
existence of such universal behavior, exhibited by vari-
ous and very distinctive strongly correlated Fermi sys-
tems, supports the conclusion that HF compounds rep-
resent a new state of matter [31, 9]. In contrast to the
situation for an ordinary quantum phase transition, this
scaling, induced by the topological FCQPT, occurs up
to high characteristic temperature T
f
, T<T
f
100 K,
since the NFL behavior is defined by quasiparticles
(with M
N
given by Eqs. (8) and (12)), rather than by
fluctuations, or by Kondo lattice effects [6, 7, 9].
Some remarks are in order here. A strongly corre-
lated Fermi system can be situated after the topolog-
ical FCQPT, i.e., on the ordered side defined by the
quantum critical line (QCL), as shown in the schematic
phase diagram 4. As it is shown in Fig. 4, FCQPT can
be tuned by dimensionless control parameters: normal-
ized pressure P/P
c
, composition x/x
c
, magnetic field
B/B
c
. Here we assume that the critical magnetic field
B
c
> 0.InthecaseofB
c
=0, see Fig. 2, demonstrating
that at T =0and B =0the system is located at the
topological FCQPT. Note that there can be two critical
magnetic fields B
c1
and B
c2
,asitisincaseoftheHF
metal Sr
3
Ru
2
O
7
[34, 15].
As it is seen from Fig. 4, at T =0the crossover re-
gion is absent, and the FC state is separated from the
LFL region by the first order phase transition [6], for
JETP Letters
6 V.R.Shaginyan, A.Z.Msezane, J.W.Clark, G.S.Japaridze, Y.S.Leevik
Fig. 3. (Color online) Universal B/T scaling of strongly
correlated Fermi systems. Scaling behavior of the
HF metal CeCu
6x
Au
x
with x =0.1 is ex-
tracted from data (measured at different eld values
B =0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.05 T) in [32], and that of
ZnCu
3
(OH)
6
Cl
2
(measured at different field values B =
=0.5, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 10.0, 14.0 T), from data in [33]. At
B/T 1 the systems demonstrate NFL behavior with
χ M
as given by Eq. (4), i.e., T
2/3
χ const. At
B/T 1 the systems demonstrate LFL behavior with
χ as given by Eq. (5), a decreasing function of B/T (see
Eq. (12)). The LFL, crossover, inflection point, and NFL
behavior are indicated by the arrows. The broken lines in-
dicate the asymptotic dependencies in the limits of small
(B/T)
N
(the NFL behavior) and large (B/T)
N
(the LFL
behavior). The theoretical prediction is represented by
solid curve
the FC state is characterized by special quantum topo-
logical number, being a new type of Fermi liquid [2].
At T>0 there is the crossover rather than a phase
transition [6]. One may expect that the T/B scaling is
caused by features not related to the presence of QCP
and the divergence of M
(see e.g. [12]). On the other
hand, if the system in question is located before FC-
QPT, as indicated by the dash-dot arrow in Fig. 4, it
exhibits LFL behavior even in the absence of a mag-
netic field B at low T 0. At elevated magnetic fields
reaching B B
0
, Eqs. (5) and (11) are valid and the
scaling behavior returns to that given by Eqs. (8) and
(12). Thus, to witness the presence of both the scaling
behavior and divergence of the effective mass in mea-
surements on HF compounds, one has to carry out mea-
surements at sufficiently low temperatures and magnetic
fields. For instance, the HF metal CeRu
2
Si
2
exhibits
NFL behavior at low temperatures (down to 170 mK)
and small magnetic fields (B 0.02 mT) comparable
with the magnetic field of the Earth [35]. Measurements
carried out under application of magnetic fields have
led to the incorrect statement that CeRu
2
Si
2
demon-
Fig. 4. (Color online) Schematic diagram of temperature
versus these dimensionless control parameters: normalized
pressure P/P
c
, composition x/x
c
, magnetic eld B/B
c
.
We assume that B
c
> 0,ifB
c
=0, see the phase di-
agram 2. The solid black line indicates the topological
FCQPT point (orange circle). At T =0and beyond the
quantum critical point (to the left of the orange circle), the
system is on the quantum critical line (QCL) implicating
a flat band, as indicated by the red-dashed arrow. At any
finite temperature T<T
f
and at elevated P/P
c
> 1,
x/x
c
> 1, B/B
c
> 1, the system enters the crossover
and, then, the LFL region. The blue dash-dot arrow points
to the system as situated before the topological FCQPT,
where at T 0 it exhibits LFL behavior with effective
mass M
= M
0
. At elevated magnetic fields, the behavior
of the effective mass is given by Eq. (7), and the scaling
behavior is restored at B>B
0
strates LFL behavior at low temperatures (see [35] and
references therein). We note that if the critical magnetic
field B
c
is finite, then the scaling behavior occurs versus
T/(B B
c
) [31].
Violation of scaling behavior. Now we consider
the statement that the scaling behavior can be ob-
served without the presence of both QCP and diver-
gent effective mass M
[12]. The T/B scaling behaviors
experimentally observed in measurements of the mag-
netization dM/dT on the HF metals YbCo
2
Ge
4
and
β YbAlB
4
[12, 11] are displayed in Figs. 5 and 6.
As follows from Eqs. (12), (13), and (15), the function
B
1/2
dM/dT can be represented as
dM
dT
=
∂χ(B
1
,T)
∂T
dB
1
M
M
dM
N
(y)
dy
ydy, (17)
where y = T/B. Taking into account Eq. (13), we obtain
M
M
B
1/2
and Eq. (17) then reads
B
1/2
dM
dT
dM
N
(y)
dy
ydy, (18)
JETP Letters
Universal T/B Sca ling Behavior of Heavy Fermion Compounds 7
Fig. 5. (Color online) YbCo
2
Ge
4
: Scaling behav-
ior of the dimensionless normalized magnetization
(B
1/2
dM(T,B)/dT )
N
versus dimensionless (T/B)
N
,
measured at different field values B =0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3,
0.5 T. The data are extracted from measurements; see
Fig. 4 of [12]. The LFL, crossover and NFL behaviors
are indicated by the arrows and hatched areas. The
theory is represented by the solid curve, describing
very well the scaling behavior of (B
1/2
dM(T,B)/dT )
N
obtained in measurements on β YbAlB
4
[11] (see Fig. 6).
The LFL and NFL behaviors of (B
1/2
dM(T,B)/dT )
N
are represented by the labels B
3/2
T and T
3/2
B,
respectively
thus, B
1/2
dM/dT is a function of the only variable T/B,
with M
N
(y) is given by Eq. (12).
As seen from Figs. 5 and 6, Eq. (18) and the corre-
sponding calculations, represented by the solid curve,
are in good agreement with the data [12, 11, 8]. To
calculate the LFL behavior of dM/dT taking place at
(T/B)
N
1, i.e., T B, we use the well-known rela-
tion dM/dT = dS/dB. Taking into account Eq. (11), we
obtain dS/dB = M
(B)T/dB B
3/2
T ,asshownin
Figs. 5 and 6. At (T/B)
N
1, i.e., B T , the system
exhibits NFL behavior. Using Eq. (10), we arrive at
dM
dT
=
χ(T )
dT
dB
M
(T )
dT
dB T
3/2
B. (19)
This theoretical result is in good agreement with ex-
perimental observations [11, 12]. Accordingly, we con-
clude that the fermion-condensation theory correctly de-
scribes the scaling behavior, showing good agreement
with the data.
Now we turn to the magnetic Gr¨uneisen parameter
Γ
mag
(T )=(dM/dT )/C in the NFL regime, i.e., at
B T , with results reported in Fig. 7a. It is seen that
Γ
mag
(T ) has an inflection point at T = T
inf
, signaling
that there is LFL behavior at lower temperatures rather
than a divergence (see also Fig. 1). Thus, we assume that
Fig. 6. (Color online) β YbAlB
4
: Scaling behav-
ior of the dimensionless normalized magnetization
(B
1/2
dM(T,B)/dT )
N
versus the dimensionless normal-
ized (B/T)
N
at different magnetic elds (0.31 mT B
2T) [8, 7]. The data are extracted from measurements
on βYbAlB
4
[11]. The LFL behavior, crossover, and NFL
behavior are indicated by the arrows. Additionally, the
LFL behavior and the crossover are shown by the hatched
areas. At (T/B)
N
1 the NFL behavior is marked by
the label T
3/2
B.At(T/B)
N
1 the LFL behavior is
marked by the label TB
3/2
. The theory is represented
by the solid curve. Notation is specified in the caption of
Fig. 5
the HF metal YbCo
2
Ge
4
is located before the topologi-
cal FCQPT, as indicated by the dash-dot arrow in Fig. 4.
We note that the inflection point takes place at too
low temperatures and magnetic fields, and it could not
make a visible impact on the scaling behavior reported
in Fig. 5, that is, one needs to carry out measurements
at sufficiently low T and B to clarify a possible violation
of the scaling behavior. We suggest that YbCo
2
Ge
4
can
be tuned to FCQPT by the application of pressure or by
doping, as it is done in the case of CeCu
6x
Au
x
, while
experimental facts show that B
c
=0and the application
of magnetic field drives YbCo
2
Ge
4
from its QCP [12].
The LFL behavior of YbCo
2
Ge
4
at T 0 is supported
by the measurements of Γ
mag
(T ), which exhibits diver-
gent behavior T
5/2
at the interval T
cr
T 0.8 K, as
it is seen from Fig. 7, where T
cr
is the crossover temper-
ature. At T T
cr
the magnetic Gr¨uneisen parameter
Γ
mag
(T ) does not follow the behavior indicated by the
straight line because YbCo
2
Ge
4
enters the crossover re-
gion (see Figs. 1 and 7). At the interval T
cr
T 0.8 K
one has Γ
mag
(T )=(dM/dT )/C T
3/2
/T = T
5/2
,
since at T 0.8 KandB =0the heat capacity C
demonstrates LFL behavior, namely C(T ) T [12]. It is
seen from Fig. 7 that at T 0.15 K, YbCo
2
Ge
4
exhibits
JETP Letters
8 V.R.Shaginyan, A.Z.Msezane, J.W.Clark, G.S.Japaridze, Y.S.Leevik
Fig. 7. (Color online) YbCo
2
Ge
4
: Magnetic Gr¨uneisen pa-
rameter Γ
mag
(T )=(dM/dT )/C versus B for values
shown in the legend. The data are taken from [12]. (a)
Γ
mag
(T ) versus a logarithmic temperature scale. The ap-
proximate location of the inflection point at temperature
T
inf
is indicated by the arrow. (b) Γ
mag
(T ) is shown on
a double-logarithmic plot. The solid line displays a T
5/2
dependence at B =0.05 T. At T = T
cr
YbCo
2
Ge
4
en-
ters the crossover, see Fig. 2, and the dependence T
5/2
is
vanished
LFL behavior induced by the application of magnetic
field B =0.1. This behavior qualitatively resembles that
occurring at B =0.05 T.
Thus, we predict that at lower temperatures,
Γ
mag
(T ) will also exhibit LFL behavior. The mea-
surements of dM/dT depicted in Fig. 8 support this
conclusion: at T T
cr
, one finds dM/dT T
3/2
(see
also Figs. 5 and 6), while at T T
cr
the divergent
behavior disappears. It is seen from Fig. 8 that dM/dT
deviates from a straight line for T T
cr
,enteringthe
crossover region and finally exhibiting LFL behavior
(see Figs. 1 and 4). We note that the same behavior is
seen in the frustrated magnet ZnCu
3
(OH)
6
Cl
2
,which
hosts a quantum spin liquid and demonstrates LFL
behavior at T<400 mK [36]. The scaling behavior is
Fig. 8. (Color online) The dM/dT NFL behavior at fixed
field B =0.05 T. The solid line indicates T
3/2
depen-
dence on a double-logarithmic plot. The experimental data
are taken from [12]. The temperature T
cr
at which the sys-
tem enters the crossover region is indicated by the arrow.
See also Fig. 1
expected to be violated in the LFL region, whereas
it would be restored with growing temperatures
T>400 mK [37, 38]. It is seen from Fig. 3 that the
scaling behavior is not violated at (B/T) 1,forthe
measurements are taken at T 1.8 K [33]. We expect
the scaling violation at T<300 mK and B<0.4 T
at the LFL behavior, see Fig. 3. As to YbCo
2
Ge
4
,
we suggest that measurements of the thermodynamic
properties at very low temperatures and magnetic fields
can clarify the physics of scaling behavior accompanied
by the divergence of the effective mass. While by now
it is impossible to exclude the possibility of the scaling
behavior down to the lowest temperatures without the
M
divergence.
Conclusion. The T/B scaling behavior of HF com-
pounds has been investigated at some depth. It is shown
that the HF metal YbCo
2
Ge
4
does not exhibit scaling
behavior down to lowest temperatures, since it is lo-
cated before the topological fermion condensate quan-
tum phase transition (FCQPT). For the same reason,
theeectivemassdoesnotdivergeatthelowesttem-
peratures. Based both on the theoretical consideration
and the experimental facts, we have shown that there
is no scaling without both the topological FCQPT and
divergence of the effective mass. We have demonstrated
that HF compounds exhibit the T/B scaling down to the
lowest temperatures, provided these systems are located
at the topological FCQPT. We suggest that measure-
ments of the thermodynamic properties at very low tem-
peratures and magnetic fields on YbCo
2
Ge
4
can clarify
the physics of scaling behavior without the divergence
of the effective mass. We have outlined that the diver-
JETP Letters
Universal T/B Sca ling Behavior of Heavy Fermion Compounds 9
genceofeectivemassM
at T 0 is of crucial im-
portance for projecting possible technological applica-
tions of quantum materials. We have also demonstrated
that the topological fermion condensation theory gives
a good description of the scaling behavior of various HF
compounds. As a result, the theory can be used as well
to evaluate the technological perspectives of quantum
materials. Our results are in good agreement with ex-
perimental observations.
We thank V. A. Khodel for stimulating and fruitful
discussions.
This work was partly supported by U.S. Department
of Energy, Division of Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic
Energy Sciences, Office of Energy Research. J. W. Clark
is indebted to the University of Madeira for gracious
hospitality during periods of extended residence.
1. V. A. Khodel and V. R. Shaginyan, JETP Lett. 51, 553
(1990).
2. G. E. Volovik, JETP Lett. 53, 222 (1991).
3. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,
E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature 556,43
(2018).
4. V. A. Khodel, V. R. Shaginyan, and V. V. Khodel, Phys.
Rep. 249, 1 (1994).
5. G. E. Volovik, JETP Lett. 107, 516 (2018).
6. V. R. Shaginyan, M. Ya. Amusia, A. Z. Msezane, and
K. G. Popov, Phys. Rep. 492, 31 (2010).
7. M. Ya. Amusia, K. G. Popov, V. R. Shaginyan, and
W. A. Stephanowich, Theory of Heavy-Fermion Com-
pounds, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences,
Springer, Berlin (2015), v. 182.
8. V. R. Shaginyan, A. Z. Msezane, K. G. Popov, J. W.
Clark, V. A. Khodel, and M. V. Zverev, Phys. Rev. B
93, 205126 (2016).
9. M. Ya. Amusia and V. R. Shaginyan, Stronlgly Corre-
lated Fermi Systems: A new State of Matter, Springer
Tracts in Modern Physics, Springer, Berlin (2020),
v. 283.
10. Y. Matsumoto, S. Nakatsuji, K. Kuga, Y. Karaki,
N. Horie, Y. Shimura, T. Sakakibara, A. H. Nevidom-
skyy, and P. Coleman, Science 331 , 316 (2011).
11. T. Tomita, K. Kuga, Y. Uwatoko, P. Coleman, and
S. Nakatsuji, Science 349, 506 (2015).
12. A. Sakai, K. Kitagawa, K. Matsubayashi, M. Iwatani,
and P. Gegenwart, Phys. Rev. B 94, 041106(R) (2016).
13. Y. Komijani and P. Coleman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122,
217001 (2019).
14. E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics,
Part 1, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1996).
15. V. R. Shaginyan, K. G. Popov, and V. A. Khodel, Phys.
Rev. B 88, 115103 (2013).
16. V. A. Khodel, J. W. Clark, and M. V. Zverev, JETP
Lett. 90, 628 (2010).
17. C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2723 (1985).
18. V. R. Shaginyan, Phys. Lett. A 249, 237 (1998).
19. D. Yudin, D. Hirschmeier, H. Hafermann, O. Eriks-
son, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 112, 070403 (2014).
20.S.Link,S.Forti,A.St¨ohr, K. Ks¨uter, M. osner,
D.Hirschmeier,C.Chen,J.Avila,M.C.Asensio,
A. A. Zakharov, T. O. Wehling, A. I. Lichtenstein,
M. I. Katsnelson, and U. Starke, Phys. Rev. B 100,
121407(R) (2019).
21. V. A. Khodel, J. W. Clark, and M. V. Zverev, Physics of
Atomic Nuclei 74, 1237 (2011).
22. L. D. Landau, ZhETF 30, 1058 (1956).
23. J. W. Clark, V. A. Khodel, and M. V. Zverev, Phys. Rev.
B 71, 012401 (2005).
24. E. M. Lifshitz and L. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics. Part
2, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2002).
25. V. A. Khodel, M. V. Zverev, and J. W. Clark, JETP
Lett. 81, 315 (2005).
26. V. R. Shaginyan, A. Z. Msezane, K. G. Popov,
G. S. Japaridze, and V. A. Khodel, Phys. Rev. B
87, 245122 (2013).
27. R. Widmer, P. Gr¨oning, M. Feuerbacher, and
O. Gr¨oning, Phys. Rev. B 79, 104202 (2009).
28. K. Deguchi, S. Matsukawa, N. K. Sato, T. Hattori,
K. Ishida, H. Takakura, and T. Ishimasa, Nature Mate-
rials 11, 1013 (2012).
29. T. Fujiwara and T. Yokokawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 333
(1991).
30. T. Fujiwara, S. Yamamoto, and G. T. de Laissardi`ere,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4166 (1993).
31. V. R. Shaginyan, V. A. Stephanovich, A. Z. Msezane,
P. Schuck, J. W. Clark, M. Ya. Amusia, G. S. Japaridze,
K. G. Popov, and E. V. Kirichenko, J. Low Temp. Phys.
189, 410 (2017).
32. A. Schr¨oder,G.Aeppli,R.Coldea,M.Adams,O.Stock-
ert, H. v. ohneysen, E. Bucher, R. Ramazashvili, and
P. Coleman, Nature 407, 351 (2000).
33. J. S. Helton, K. Matan, M. P. Shores, E. A. Nytko,
B. M. Bartlett, Y. Qiu, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 147201 (2010).
34. V. R. Shaginyan, A. Z. Msezane, K. G. Popov,
J. W. Clark, M. V. Zverev, and V. A. Khodel, Phys.
Lett. A 377, 2800 (2013).
35. D. Takahashi, S. Abe, H. Mizuno, D. Tayurskii, K. Mat-
sumoto, H. Suzuki, and Y. Onuki, Phys. Rev. B 67,
180407(R) (2003).
36. J. S. Helton, K. Matan, M. P. Shores, E. A. Nytko,
B. M. Bartlett, Y. Yoshida, Y. Takano, A. Suslov,
Y. Qiu, J.-H. Chung, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 98, 107204 (2007).
37. V. R. Shaginyan, A. Z. Msezane, and K. G. Popov, Phys.
Rev. B 84, 060401(R) (2011).
38. V. R. Shaginyan, V. A. Stephanovich, A. Z. Msezane,
G. S. Japaridze, J. W. Clark, M. Ya. Amusia, and
E. V. Kirichenko, J. Mater. Sci. 55, 2257 (2020).
JETP Letters