Preparation and solid state NMR characterization of phosphonates encapsulated in raw
and organically modified SBA-15
Thierry Azais
1
, Daniela Aiello
2
, Flaviano Testa
2
, Guillaume Laurent
1
, and Florence Babonneau
1
1
Laboratoire Chimie de la Matière Condensée de Paris, Université Paris 6 – CNRS, UMR 7574
Collège de France, Paris, 75005, France.
2
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, CR-INSTM, University of Calabria,
87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy.
ABSTRACT
We present in this communication the preparation and the solid state NMR
characterization of phenyl phosphonic acid encapsulated both in pure and aminopropyl-modified
SBA-15 mesoporous silica materials. The
31
P and
1
H MAS studies revealed two radically
different behaviors of the confined molecules. The included phosphonic acid in SBA-15 is
submitted to a confinement effect that implies a weak interaction with the SiO
2
surface and a
relative mobility at room temperature. On the contrary, phenyl phosphonic acid molecules in the
aminopropyl modified sample possess a strong interaction with the hybrid surface of the
material. This finding is supported by a two dimensional double-quantum
1
H experiment that
revealed the close proximity between phenyl phosphonic acid and aminopropyl surface groups.
INTRODUCTION
Ordered mesoporous silica matrices are a class of materials highly attractive in reason of
a high porous volume associated to a high specific area (up to 1000 m
2
.g
-1
). Since 2001, their
textural characteristics are widely used in order to store and release drug molecules [1].Up to
now many studies have been done on different micelles templated silica materials such as MCM-
41 or SBA-15 [2]. In particular, it has been shown that a functionalization of the pore surface can
provide a control of the drug release kinetic [3]. Recently, similar drug delivery systems have
been designed with alendronate, a drug that belongs to the class of bisphosphonates that inhibit
bone resorption and consequently help fight osteoporosis. It has been shown that the
modification of the siliceous pore surface with aminopropyl groups allows to optimize the
amount of the encapsulated drug and to tune drug release kinetic [4]. The kinetic properties of
these drug release systems seem to be linked to the physical state of the confined molecules and
its chemical interaction with the pore surface [5]. Nevertheless, the relationship between release
properties and chemical properties is still not well understood and for this reason we choose to
study phenyl phosphonic acid as a model-molecule for bisphosphonates, confined in pure and
aminopropyl-modified SBA-15. We characterized these materials by means of solid state NMR
which is a perfect tool to differentiate different physical state of a drug and also to probe host-
guest interactions [6]. In particular we studied in details the inclusion of phenyl phosphonic acid
through
31
P and
1
H MAS NMR experiments that revealed different physical behavior for the
guest molecules depending on the chemical nature of the porous surface of the host material.
Finally, we showed that host-guest proximities can be efficiently explored using a two-
dimensional
1
H double quantum experiment recorded at high magnetic field (B
0
= 16.4 T)
combined to an ultra high fast MAS (65 kHz) in order to recover a good spectral resolution.
Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 1227 © 2010 Materials Research Society 1227-JJ04-06
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
Synthesis of raw and organically modified SBA15 and phenyl phosphonic acid loading
The preparation of the silica-based SBA-15 material was similar to the method described
by Zhao et al. [7]. The template solution was prepared dissolving 4.0 g of Pluronic
®
P123
(Fluka) in 104 mL of deionized water and 20 mL of 37 wt% HCl with stirring at 35°C. Then,
9.16 mL of TEOS were added into the solution under magnetic stirring for 12 hours at room
temperature. The molar composition of final gel mixture was TEOS/HCl/P123/H
2
O =
1:6.03:0.017:145. The white precipitate was aged at 100°C for 24 hours, then filtered, washed
with deionised water and dried at 60°C for 12 hours. The free template material (named SBA)
was obtained through a calcination of the surfactant molecules at 550°C in 8 hours in air (heating
rate of 10°C/min). The amine-functionalized material (named SBA-NH) was synthesized
through a post-synthesis grafting. For this purpose 1 g of the free template mesoporous materials,
previously activate in an oven at 120°C for 2 hours, was mixed with 1.33 mL of APTES
((C
2
H
5
0)
3
Si(CH
2
)
3
NH
2
; Aldrich) in 20 mL of toluene (Fluka) under magnetic stirring. The
mixture was heated under reflux at 110°C overnight and the product was filtered, washed with
toluene and dried at 100°C overnight. The encapsulation process was performed by the incipient
wetness procedure [8], after a activation at 100°C for 12 hours of the free template and the
amine-functionalized samples. Then, 0.500 g of the powders was soaked by a solution of
phenylphosphonic acid ΦP (C
6
H
5
PO(OH)
2
; Fluka; 0.012 g cm
-3
) in ethanol. This procedure was
repeated successively three times, and after each impregnation, the solvent was removed by
heating at 70°C overnight. After the third impregnation, the samples were washed with 4 ml of
ethanol in order to remove the excess of phenyl phosphonic acid. The samples were then dried in
oven at 70°C overnight. The free template and the amine-functionalized samples loaded with
phenyl phosphonic acid will be referred in the forthcoming text as SBA-ΦP and SBA-NH-ΦP,
respectively, where ΦP stands for phenyl phosphonic acid.
Solid state NMR characterization
1
H, and
31
P solid state NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance III 300
spectrometer operating at ν
0
(
1
H) = 300.30 MHz, and ν
0
(
31
P) = 121.49 MHz (B
0
= 7 T) using a 4
mm Bruker MAS probe. The spinning rate ν
MAS
was 14 kHz for
1
H and
31
P MAS experiments
and 5 kHz for
31
P CP MAS experiments. The two-dimensional 2D double quantum DQ
1
H
experiment was performed on a Bruker Avance III 700 spectrometer (B
0
= 16.4 T) operating at
ν
0
(
1
H) = 700.20 MHz using a 1.3 mm Bruker ultra fast MAS probe (ν
MAS
= 65 kHz).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Loading and mesoporous characteristics
Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of our samples were found to be of type IV
according to the IUPAC classification, with a H1 type hysteresis loops characteristic of
mesoporous solids. A S
BET
of 766 m
2
.g
-1
and 355 m
2
.g
-1
for the free-template SBA sample and
the amine-functionalized SBA-NH sample, respectively, were calculated using the BET model
[9]. Moreover, a narrow distribution of pores was observed with an average pore diameter D
P
of
60 Å and 54 Å for SBA and SBA-NH, respectively that were determined with the BJH (Barrett-
Joyner-Halenda) method based on the desorption branch of the isotherms [10]. Once loaded with
phenyl phosphonic acid a substantial reduction of the S
BET
is found for both samples. We
measured a specific surface area of 425 m
2
.g
-1
and 250 m
2
.g
-1
for SBA-ΦP and SBA-NH-ΦP,
respectively. These values correspond to a S
BET
decrease of 45 % and 30 %, respectively, when
compared to the initial values of unloaded samples. These data suggests an efficient
encapsulation of ΦP molecules into the mesoporous framework. An amount of 322 g and 380 g
of phenyl phosphonic acid molecules per gram of porous materials for SBA-ΦP and SBA-NH-
ΦP, respectively, was determined both by micro-analysis and ATD-TG. The higher amount
found for SBA-NH-ΦP could be explained by a greater affinity of ΦP molecules with the
aminopropyl group rather than with the raw silica surface of the SBA-15 material. All the
textural characteristics of our samples and the amount of loaded phenyl phosphonic acid are
summarized in Table 1.
S
BET
(m
2
/g)
V
P
(cm
3
/g)
D
P
(Å)
Isotherm
type
Amount of phosphonic
acid (mg/g)
SBA 766 0.48 60 IV
SBA-ΦP
425 0.43 57 IV 0.322
SBA-NH 355 0.43 54 IV
SBA-NH-ΦP
250 0.31 49 IV 0.380
Table 1: Textural characteristics of loaded and unloaded samples.
Solid state NMR
31
P MAS NMR spectroscopy was used here to study the inclusion of ΦP in the
mesoporous materials (Figure 1a). The
31
P MAS spectrum of the bulk phenyl phosphonic acid
displays a single resonance at 21.0 ppm, whereas the
31
P MAS spectra of the two loaded samples
show two main resonances located at 19.1 and 13.8 ppm for SBA-ΦP and SBA-NH-ΦP,
respectively. It is well known that the condensation of a phosphate or phosphonate moiety leads
to an up-field shift of the
31
P resonance [11]. Thus, the fact that the phenyl phosphonic acid
resonances of in our loaded samples are up-field shifted could be an indication of a specific
interaction of ΦP with the pores surface organically modified or not. Moreover, we note that the
31
P resonance in the amino-functionalized sample is highly shifted compared to SBA-ΦP.
Following the previous principle, the ΦP-surface interaction seems to be stronger with the
aminopropyl functionalization rather than with raw SiO
2
surface. Furthermore, we note that the
line width of the
31
P resonance of SBA-NH-ΦP is particularly broad and is 10 times larger than
the one of SBA-ΦP (10.4 ppm vs. 1.0 ppm). This is due to a wide distribution of chemical shifts
that could be explained by the fact that the ΦP/aminopropyl interaction leads to a disordered
interface. Finally, we note that a small peak at 9.4 ppm (30% of the main resonance) and a weak
shoulder centered at 6.3 ppm (15 % of the main resonance) are visible on the SBA-ΦP and the
SBA-NH-ΦP spectrum, respectively. These latter signals certainly correspond to two
phosphonate moieties condensed with each other through a P-O-P bond.
The Figure 1b displays the intensity variation of the
31
P resonances during a variable
contact time
1
H-
31
P CP MAS experiment for SBA-ΦP and SBA-NH-ΦP.
Figure 1: a)
31
P NMR spectra of bulk phenyl phosphonic acid ΦP, SBA-ΦP and SBA-NH-ΦP;
b) intensity of the main
31
P resonances as a function of a variable contact time during a
1
H-
31
P
CP MAS experiment for SBA-ΦP and SBA-NH-ΦP.
The two curves are fitted with the following equation that expresses the signal intensity as a
function of two time constants [12]:
M
31P
(t
CP
) = (γ
1H
/γ
31P
)M
0
(1-λ)
-1
[-exp(-(1-λ)t
CP
/T
PH
)].exp(-t
CP
/T
(
1
H))
where t
CP
corresponds to the contact time, M
0
corresponds to the
31
P Zeeman magnetization, λ =
T
PH
/T
(
1
H) where T
PH
stands for the cross relaxation time constant and T
(
1
H) is the relaxation
time of protons in the rotating frame. We found two radically different CP dynamic behaviors for
the two loaded samples. The
31
P signal in SBA-NH-ΦP has a faster dynamic than in SBA-ΦP as
we found T
PH
= 0.66 ms and 2.22 ms, respectively. The first value is typical of bulk phenyl
phosphonic acid which has already been determined [13]. The slowest behavior found for SBA-
ΦP can be explained either by reduced source of protons compared to SBA-NH-ΦP or by a
higher mobility of ΦP in SBA-ΦP. The first assumption is unlikely because even if the acid
groups POH in ΦP are deprotonated when encapsulated, the phenyl group is still an efficient
source of proton magnetization. Indeed, previous measurements done on deuterated phenyl
phosphonic acid (C
6
H
5
PO(OD)
2
) lead to a T
PH
value of 0.8 ms far away from the long 2.2 ms
value found for SBA-ΦP [13]. This long
1
H-
31
P cross relaxation time constant can only be
explained by a higher mobility of the ΦP molecules at room temperature that averages the
1
H-
31
P
heteronuclear dipolar interaction. This higher mobility compared to bulk ΦP and ΦP
encapsulated in SBA-NH is certainly due to the so-called confinement effect that acts on small
molecules confined in mesopores [14]. This effect has already been evidenced on carboxylic
acids such as benzoic or lauric acid confined in MCM-41 [15] where the liquid-solid phase
transitions of such molecules were deeply depressed compared to the bulk. Furthermore, we note
that the proton relaxation time in the rotating frame is also very different for the two samples.
We found T
(
1
H) = 1.79 ms for SBA-NH-ΦP whereas no T
(
1
H) effect was detected in the
range 0-10 ms for SBA-ΦP (T
(
1
H) >> 10 ms). The longer T
(
1
H) found for SBA-ΦP is also a
sign of a higher mobility of FP molecules in SBA-ΦP compared to SBA-NH-ΦP [16].
1
H NMR spectroscopy is also an excellent probe for molecules mobility studies as shown
on Figure 2a.The
1
H MAS spectrum of bulk ΦP displays a broad signal corresponding mainly to
-10-50510152025303540
Φ
ΦΦ
ΦP
SBA -Φ
ΦΦ
ΦP
SBA-NH-Φ
ΦΦ
ΦP
SBA-NH-ΦP
SBA-ΦP
Contact time (ms)
Intensity (a. u.)
a)
b)
(ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
the proton resonances of the phenyl ring and the POH groups [17]. The
1
H MAS spectrum of
SBA-NH-ΦP displays also a broad signal dominated by the proton resonances of encapsulated
ΦP and aminopropyl groups. These two broad spectra are characteristics of rigid compounds
where the
1
H-
1
H homonuclear dipolar coupling dominates all other interactions. On the contrary,
the
1
H MAS spectrum of SBA-ΦP displays thin resonances that correspond to the phenyl ring of
encapsulated ΦP. These unusual narrow resonances are due to the average of the
1
H-
1
H
homonuclear dipolar interaction in reason of the relative mobility of ΦP molecules in SBA-ΦP.
This result confirms the presence of confinement effect for phenyl phosphonic acid confined in
SBA-15. Moreover, we note that the resonances of POH groups (expected around 12 ppm) are
absent on the latter spectrum in reason of a chemical exchange at room temperature [5].
Figure 2: a)
1
H MAS NMR spectra of ΦP, SBA-NH-ΦP and SBA-ΦP recorded at ν
MAS
= 14
kHz and Β
0
= 7 Τ b) 2D MAS DQ spectrum of SBA-NH-ΦP recorded at ν
MAS
= 65 kHz and
Β
0
= 16.4 Τ (the
1
H MAS NMR spectra of SBA-NH-ΦP recorded at ν
MAS
= 14 kHz and Β
0
= 7 Τ
is also shown for comparison).
The precise characterization of the interface between mesoporous materials surface and
confined species is usually a hard task. Indeed, when the confined molecule is submitted to a
confinement effect like in the case of ΦP in SBA-ΦP material, its relative mobility averages out
the dipolar couplings that inform on nuclei proximities. On the other hand, when the SiO
2
surface is organically modified, the interaction between the confined species and the hybrid
surface can be much stronger and lead to a rigid system. The direct consequence is a lack of the
spectral resolution for the
1
H spectra that became hard to analyze like in the case of SBA-NH-
ΦP. A strategy to enhance this spectral resolution is to increase the static magnetic field B
0
and
the ν
MAS
. The Figure 2b gives an excellent illustration to that statement. We recorded a 2D MAS
DQ
1
H spectrum of SBA-NH-ΦP at ν
MAS
= 65 kHz and Β
0
= 16.4 T with the BABA sequence
which is based on the
1
H-
1
H dipolar interaction [18]. The gain in resolution is impressive when
compared to the equivalent spectrum recorded at ν
MAS
= 14 kHz and Β
0
= 7 T. Two distinct
signals are now visible instead of one broad envelope. Three proton resonances centered at 1.5
ppm on the single quantum SQ dimension can be safely assigned to CH
2
groups of the
aminopropyl function. The resonances centered at 7 ppm correspond to phenyl protons of
included ΦP. Interestingly, strong double quantum cross peaks are clearly evidenced between the
phenyl and the three distinct CH
2
protons revealing the close proximity between ΦP and the
propyl group. This result strengthens our previous assumption i.e. the existence of a strong
(ppm)
-20-1001020304050
Φ
ΦΦ
ΦP
SBA-NH-Φ
ΦΦ
ΦP
SBA-Φ
ΦΦ
ΦP
a)
SQ
1
H
DQ
1
H
(ppm)
01020 -10
b)
ν
νν
ν
MAS
= 14 kHz
B
0
= 7 T
ν
νν
ν
MAS
= 65 kHz
B
0
= 16.4 T
interaction between ΦP and the aminopropyl group of the surface-grafted organic function in
SBA-NH-ΦP. This strong interaction could be present as H-bonding (POH...NH
2
) or ionic
interaction (PO
-
...NH
3
+
).
CONCLUSION
1
H and
31
P MAS NMR experiments revealed two distinct behaviors for the guest
molecules whether ΦP is encapsulated in pure SBA-15 or in amino-modified SBA-15. In the
first case, ΦP is submitted to a confinement effect that implies a relative mobility at room
temperature and a weak interaction with the siliceous surface. In the second case, ΦP is rigid and
presents a strong interaction with the amino surface groups. Furthermore, we showed that a high
magnetic field (B
0
= 16.4 T) combined to an ultra high fast MAS (65 kHz) allows an impressive
gain in proton spectral resolution. The close proximity between ΦP and aminopropyl surface
groups is then evidenced by a 2D
1
H DQ BABA experiment.
REFERENCES
1. Vallet-Regi, M.; Ramila, A.; del Real, R. P.; Pérez-Pariente, J. Chem. Mater. 13, 308 (2001).
2. Vallet-Regi, M.; Balas, F.; Arcos, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 7548 (2007).
3. Andersson, J.; Rosenholm, J.; Areva, S.; Lindén, M. Chem. Mater. 16, 4160 (2004).
4. F. Balas, M. Manzano, P. Horcajada, and M. Vallet-Regi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8116
(2006)
5. Azaïs T.; Tourné-Pétheil C.; Aussenac F.; Baccile N.; Coelho C.; Devoisselle J-M.;
Babonneau F. Chem. Mater. 18, 6382 (2006).
6. Bonhomme, C.; Coelho, C.; Baccile, N.; Gervais, C.; Azaïs, T.; Babonneau, F. Accounts
Chem. Res. 40, 738 (2007).
7. D. Zhao, J. Feng, Q. Huo, N. Melosh, G.H. Fredrickson, B.F. Chmelka, G.D. Stucky, Science
279, 548 (1998).
8. C. Charnay, S. Begu, C. Tourne-Peteilh, L. Nicole, D.A. Lerner, J.-M., Devoisselle, Eur.
Pharm. Biopharm. 57, 533 (2004).
9. S. Brunauer, P.H. Emmett, E.J. Teller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309 (1938)
10. P. Barrett, L.G. Joyner, P. Halenda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73, 373 (1951)
11. M. M. Crutchfield, C. F. Callis, R. R. Irani, G. C. Roth, Inorg. Chem., 1, 4, 813 (1962).
12. A. Pines, M. Gribby, J. Waugh, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 569 (1973).
13. G. P. Holland, R. Sharma, J. O. Agola, S. Amin, V. C. Solomon, P. Singh, D. A. Buttry and
J. L. Yarger, Chem. Mater. 19, 2519 (2007)
14. Alba-Simionesco, C.; Coasne, B.; Dosseh, G.; Dudziak, G.; Gubbins, K E.; Radhakrishnan
R.; Sliwinska-Bartkowiak, M. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, R15 (2006).
15. Azaïs T.; Hartmeyer, G.; Quignard, S.; Laurent, G.; Tourné-Péteilh, C.; Devoisselle, J-M.;
Babonneau, F. Pure Appl. Chem. 81, 1345 (2009).
16. K. Schmidt-Rohr, H. W. Spiess, « Multinuclear NMR in Solids and Polymers », Acad.
Presse, 1996.
17. C. Gervais, M. Profeta, V. Lafond, C. Bonhomme, T. Azaïs, H. Mutin,C. J. Pickard, F.
Mauri, F. Babonneau, Magn. Reson. Chem. 42, 445 (2004).
18. Schnell, I.; Spiess, H. W. J. Magn. Reson. 151, 153 (2001).