Communications ,00.c
Liquid
Lattice Imperfections Studied by
16oo
X-Ray Diffraction in Deformed
Aluminum-Base Alloys: AI-Cu Alloy 4oo
o
o
S.K. CHATTOPADHYAY, S.K. CHATTERJEE, 300
and S.P. SENGUPTA
200
The present analysis is a continuation of the program
of study of lattice imperfections in deformed aluminum- f0o
base alloys. ~ Detailed X-ray diffraction study t2-6] has been
I ~ l
0
performed on aluminum-base copper alloys in four dif- 60
70
S0 90 100
ferent compositions, namely, 0.32, 0.84, 1.15, and
1.26 at. pct of Copper. The alloys were prepared from
spectroscopically pure ingredients supplied by Johnson-
Matthey Co. Ltd., London, by following the procedure
adopted in the preceding work of this series. [~] The alloys
were later homogenized at 530 ~ for 15 days in the face
centered cubic phase (Figure 1). The cold working was
achieved as usual by hand filling. A portion of the filling
from each alloy was annealed at 520 ~ to relieve the
stress so that the same be used as standard for the Stokes'
instrumental correction done earlier. The same proce-
dure tl] was followed to prepare a sample for the Siemens
Kristallofluex-4 X-ray diffractometer, and X-ray diffrac-
tion profiles were recorded by using CuK~ radiation. The
detailed line shift, line asymmetry, and line shape anal-
yses were performed by following the procedures and
using the equation mentioned used before. [1'4-s] The
microstructural parameters, like coherent domain sizes
(De),
microstrain (e~), stacking faults or', cz" (intrinsic
and extrinsic), deformation twin fault/3, dislocation den-
sity p, and stacking fault energy parameter 7//x, were
determined.
The line shift analysis was done by using the neigh-
boring peaks and considering the effects of lattice pa-
rameter change
Aa/ao
and intrinsic and extrinsic faulting
(a' - a"). The residual stress or in these alloy systems
was considered to be zero as it is considered for random
powder sample, t~'4-61 The values of lattice parameter
change
Aa/ao
which is due to dislocation arrangements
were found to be extremely small, indicating negligible
distortion of the lattice on cold work. The values of
(a' - a"), neglecting
Aa/ao,
were also calculated and
are shown in the Table I. The small values of (a' - a"),
almost within the error limits, show a negligible effect
of faulting. Unlike the AI-Ge system, t~] where a slight
indication of the faulting was observed at the higher con-
centration of Ge, this alloy system shows a negligible
effect of faulting even at higher concentration. This is
also evident from the negligible fluctuation of the lattice
Wt *]o At
Fig. 1 --The phase diagram of the AI-Cu system.
LI.26 oc,n~
4"05~~4~-
a
iii'.
o
4.01
4. oa
~.'o z:o
3!o 4'. o
Cos
0
Cot
9
Fig. 2--The plot of lattice parameter
am vs
extrapolation factor
cos 0 cot 0.
S.K. CHATTOPADHYAY, Lecturer, Department of Metallurgical
Engineering, and S.K. CHATTERJEE, Assistant Professor, Department
of Physics, are with the Regional Engineering College, Durgapur, India.
S.P. SENGUPTA, Professor and Head, is with the Department of
Materials Science, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science,
Jadavpur, Calcutta, India.
Manuscript submitted January 22, 1991.
parameter
ahu vs the
cos 0 cot 0 curve around the fault-
free line t4,s,6J (Figure 2).
From peak asymmetry analysis, the compound fault
probability [4.5(ot") +/3] was determined and was found
to be low, even smaller than the AI-Ge system
(Table I). m The detailed Fourier line shape analysis t2-s]
was performed considering multiple reflections, and from
the Stokes' corrected Fourier coefficients (Figure 3), the
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 23A, APRIL 1992-- 1371
Table I. The Values of Effective Domain Sizes
(De),
Root-Mean-Square Strain (e~) ~/2, Compound
Fault Probabilities, (or' - ot'~), 4.5(ot") + fl, and [l.5(tt' + ~') + fl], and Individual Values of tt', el', and
(Q~t -- O~t,)
x 103
Line 4.5(a")
+
/3 x 104 1.5(a' + a")
Shift Line De (/k) + /3 x 103
Analysis Asymmetry (Error
Limit: (e~,/2 Line Shape
Alloy (Error Analysis ---5 to x 103 Analysis a' x 103 a" x 103
Compo- Limit: (Error Limit: (Error (Error (Error
sition +-2.0 CG -+0.003 -+ 10/~) at L = 50/~
= Limit: -+3.0 Limit: -+3.0 Limit: +-1.0
(At. Pet) to -+4.0) 20 = +-0.006 Deg) 111 100 111 100 to -+5.0) to +-10.0) to +-7.0)
/3
x
103
(Error
Limit: ---3.0
to +-20.0)
A1-0.32Cu -0.09 -1.2 574 320 0.8 1.4 10.0 -10.7 -9.1
A1-0.84Cu 2.8 -7.7 390 245 1.6 1.8 11.0 - 4.0 -8.2
Al-1.15Cu 7.0 -8.3 340 180 0.2 0.4 19.0 - 2.2 -8.4
A1-1.20Uu -0.06 4.9 470 278 0.6 3.2 10.5 - 6.2 -5.0
39.6
29.1
29.5
27.1
0"75
_
ro-i I i
AL- 0"32 uu
[a-200
-
r~-I I I
At- 1.26 ~u L.~, UL_. 0.
~0"50
0"25
F ~ 200
I I I i i i
0 50 I O0 150 200 250 300
L
(A*)
Fig. 3--Fourier coefficients AL vs L (/k) for (11 l) and (200) reflections for A1-0.32 at. pet Cu and AI-1.26 at. pct Cu alloys.
effective domain sizes, microstrain (e2), and compound
fault probability 1.5(a' + a") +/3 were determined and
are shown in Table I. The values of effective domain
sizes are found to be quite high and are of the same order
as those of the AI-Ge system. The root-mean-square strain
values are also found to be small as was found for the
A1-Ge system. Combining the results of line shift, line
asymmetry, and line shape analyses, the intrinsic, ex-
trinsic, and deformation twin fault densities were cal-
culated, and the values with their respective error limits
are shown in Table I. The values of intrinsic a' and ex-
trinsic a" are found to be small and negative, respec-
tively, indicating a negligible concentration of these two
faults even at a higher concentration of solute Cu. As
regards deformation twin/3, the fault parameter which
was found to be negative and absent in the A1-Ge system
appears to be slightly above error limit and positive. This
possible indication of the presence of twin fault in this
AI-Cu system, unlike A1-Ge, may be attributed to the
solute copper which has an inclination toward twinning.
The stacking fault energy parameter
7/Iz
and dislo-
cation density p were calculated by using the equations
mentioned in the earlier works.[4,s] The values of dislo-
cation density p for this alloy system are found to be
almost uniform for all alloy compositions and of the order
of -1 1011 cm/cm 3. The value of
7/tx
is also found
to be similar to that in the A1-Ge system,
i.e.,
of the
order of 3.0 x 10 -H cm. While the dislocation density
value (~1 l0 ll cm/cm 3) is found to be much less than
that for copper-base gallium alloy tS] (20 1011), the
stacking fault energy parameter is found to be much
higher. When it is just -0.2 x 10-" cm for the Cu-Ga
system, it is 3.0 x 10 -H cm for this A1-Cu system.
Considering all of these observations, it may be con-
cluded that the A1-Cu system like pure aluminum and
the A1-Ge system tq investigated earlier is not prone to
1372--VOLUME 23A, APRIL 1992 METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A
faulting. The indication of the onset of faulting at the
higher concentration of solute which was found in the
A1-Ge system is not observed in this alloy system. Though
no X-ray diffraction work on A1-Cu has been reported,
this observation is compatible with the electron micro-
scopic observation obtained on pure aluminum and with
the X-ray diffraction analysis done on other aluminum-
base alloy systems, t~
REFERENCES
1. S.K. Chattopadhyay, S.K. Chatterjee, and S.P. Sen Gupta:
Metall. Trans. A, 1990, vol. 21A, pp. 2597-98.
2. R.P.I. Adler and C.N.J. Wagner:
J. Appl. Phys., 1962, vol. 33,
pp. 3451-58.
3. J.B. Cohen and C.N.J. Wagner:
J. Appl. Phys., 1962, voi. 33,
pp. 2073-77.
4. S.K. Chatterjee, S.K. Halder, and S.P. Sen Gupta:
J. Appl. Phys.,
1976, vol. 47, pp. 411-19.
5. S.K. Chatterjee, S.K. Halder, and S.P. Sen Gupta:
J. Appl. Phys.,
1977, vol. 48, pp. 1442-48.
6. S.K. Chattopadhyay, S.K. Chatterjee, and S.P. Sen Gupta:
J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys., 1989, vol. 22, pp. 142-48.
7. M. De and S.P. Sen Gupta:
Pramana, 1984, vol. 23, pp. 721-44.
8. C.N.J. Wagner:
Local Atomic Arrangements Studied by X-ray Dif-
fraction,
AIME, New York, NY, 1966, vol. 36, ch. 6.
Diffusion Reaction in the
Zirconium-Copper System
K. BHANUMURTHY, G.B. KALE,
and S.K. KHERA
Diffusion reaction occurring between two solids plays
an important role in many metallurgical processes, such
as cladding, carborizing, and diffusion bonding. Inter-
diffusion in the zirconium-copper system has been stud-
ied in a limited temperature range of 873 to 977 K to
understand the compatibility between the two metals. The
only earlier work t~ in this system refers to isothermal
annealing at temperature in the vicinity of alpha-to-beta
phase transformation of zirconium. These results con-
firmed the formation of
CuaZr
and Cu3Zr in the diffusion
zone. In the present studies, detailed investigations of
the chemical diffusion in the zirconium-copper system
are reported.
Electron beam-melted zirconium (99.8 pct) ingots and
high-purity copper (99.9 pct) plates were roiled to thin
sheets of 3-mm thickness. Diffusion couples of
10 x 5 3 mm were prepared from fully annealed
(1173 K for 3 days) samples taken from these sheets.
The mating surfaces of zirconium and copper were pre-
pared by metallographic polishing up to 1-/xm diamond
finish. The polished faces of zirconium and copper were
kept in contact with each other and were loaded in a
specially made jig (at a pressure of 10 MPa) in order to
ensure intimate contact between two surfaces. The entire
assembly was placed in a vacuum furnace (10 -5 mm) for
diffusion bonding at 860 K for 10 minutes. The couples
thus prepared were sealed under helium atmosphere and
subsequently annealed in the temperature range of 873
to 977 K for periods between 0.5 and 20 hours in a pre-
heated resistance furnace controlling the temperature
within ___ 1 K with the help of a proportional controller.
The concentration penetration profiles across the pol-
ished sections perpendicular to the diffusion direction were
obtained on all of the couples. The electron probe micro-
analyses of the diffusion couples were carried out with
a stabilized beam current of 80 nA at 15 KeV. These
observed intensity ratios were corrected for atomic num-
ber, absorption, and fluorescence effects to get true con-
centrations, t21 Some of the diffusion couples were analyzed
at the interface by X-ray diffraction to confirm the stoi-
chiometry of the compound formed in the diffusion zone.
Diffusion coefficients were evaluated by both the
Boltzmann-Matano-Heumann and the Wagner methods
from the concentration penetration profiles. The details
of these two methods have been discussed elsewhere, t3m
The typical back-scattered electron micrograph of the
diffusion couple annealed at 977 K for 16 hours is shown
in Figure 1. The micrograph clearly indicates the pres-
ence of two intermetallic compounds. The X-ray dif-
fraction investigations of the fractured samples at the
interface also confirmed the presence of Cu4Zr and
CuZr 2
compounds. The typical concentration plots for the cou-
ple annealed at 977 K for 0.5 and 16 hours are shown
in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. The concentration pro-
file in Figure 2 showed smooth variations of copper and
zirconium across the diffusion zone, indicating the ab-
sence of the intermetallic compounds. However, the
coupled annealed at 977 K for 16 hours clearly revealed
two compounds,
CugZr
(Cu51Zrl4)
and
CuZr2,
(Figure 3)
in the diffusion zone. The width of the phases formed
and their temperature dependence are listed in Table I.
The plot of X (thickness)
vs Vtt
(Figure 4) for the couples
annealed at 977 K were found to be linear. The incu-
bation periods for Cu4Zr and CuZr2 compounds were es-
timated to be 1.07 and 1.03 hours, respectively.
K. BHANUMURTHY, Scientific Officer, G.B. KALE, Scientific
Officer, and S.K. KHERA, Research Coordinator, Diffusion Research
Group, are with the Metallurgy Division, Bhabha Atomic Research
Centre, Bombay 400 085, India.
Ma)nuscript submitted July 18, 1991.
Fig. 1--Back-scattered eleclron micrograph for the couple annealed
at 977 K for 16 h.
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 23A, APRIL 1992--1373