
ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.
1007/s10439-020-02599-6) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.
REFERENCES
1
Ackermann, M., S. E. Verleden, M. Kuehnel, et al. Pul-
monary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angio-
genesis in COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 383(2):120–128,
2020.
2
Adir, Y., O. Segol, D. Kompaniets, et al. COVID-19:
minimising risk to healthcare workers during aerosol-pro-
ducing respiratory therapy using an innovative constant
flow canopy. Eur. Resp. J. 55(5):1, 2020.
3
Artenstein, A. W. In pursuit of PPE. N. Engl. J. Med.
382(18):e46, 2020.
4
Balzer, C. Using 3D to make PPE: library resources help
create much-needed face shields. American Libraries Ma-
gazine.
5
Begley, J. L., K. E. Lavery, C. P. Nickson, D. J. Brewster.
The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019
patients: an in situ simulation crossover study. Anaesthe-
sia.n/a(n/a).
6
Bhatraju, P. K., B. J. Ghassemieh, M. Nichols, et al.
COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the seattle region -
case series. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(21):2012–2022, 2020.
7
Brewster, D. J., N. Chrimes, T. B. Do, et al. Consensus
statement: safe airway society principles of airway man-
agement and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19
adult patient group. Med. J. Aust. 212(10):472–481, 2020.
8
Canelli, R., C. W. Connor, M. Gonzalez, A. Nozari, and
R. Ortega. Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intuba-
tion. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(20):1957–1958, 2020.
9
Cardine, S. Good Samaritans borrow unused school
machines to 3D-print coronavirus masks, shields. Los
Angeles Times.
10
Chan, A. Should we use an ‘‘aerosol box’’ for intubation?
2020. https://litfl.com/should-we-use-an-aerosol-box-for-in
tubation/. Accessed 22 June 2020.
11
Cook, T. M., K. El-Boghdadly, B. McGuire, A. F.
McNarry, A. Patel, and A. Higgs. Consensus guidelines for
managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guide-
lines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of
Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of
Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaes-
thetists. Anaesthesia. 75(6):785–799, 2020.
12
Duggan, L. V., S. D. Marshall, J. Scott, P. G. Brindley, and
H. P. Grocott. The MacGyver bias and attraction of
homemade devices in healthcare. Can. J. Anaesth.
66(7):757–761, 2019.
13
Everington, K. Taiwanese doctor invents device to protect
US doctors against coronavirus. Taiwan News. 23 Mar
2020.
14
Go
¨
hler, D., and M. Stintz. Granulometric characterization
of airborne particulate release during spray application of
nanoparticle-doped coatings. J. Nanoparticle Res.
16(8):2520, 2014.
15
Hsu, S. H., H. Y. Lai, F. Zabaneh, F. N. Masud. Aerosol
containment box to the rescue: extra protection for the
front line. Emerg. Med. J. 2020.
16
Intubation Box. https://www.vacep.org/intubationbox.
Accessed 22 June 2020.
17
IntubationPod. https://utwpods.com/products/intubation
pod. Accessed 24 June 2020.
18
Kearsley, R. Intubation boxes for managing the airway in
patients with COVID-19. Anaesthesia. 75(7):969, 2020.
19
Leyva Moraga, F. A., E. Leyva Moraga, F. Leyva Moraga,
et al. Aerosol box, an operating room security measure in
COVID-19 pandemic. World J. Surg. 44(7):2049–2050,
2020.
20
Lindsley, W. G., F. M. Blachere, T. L. McClelland, et al.
Efficacy of an ambulance ventilation system in reducing
EMS worker exposure to airborne particles from a patient
cough aerosol simulator. J. Occup. Environ. Hygiene
16(12):804–816, 2019.
21
Lindsley, W. G., J. S. Reynolds, J. V. Szalajda, J. D. Noti,
and D. H. Beezhold. A cough aerosol simulator for the
study of disease transmission by human cough-generated
aerosols. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 47(8):937–944, 2013.
22
Madabhavi, I., M. Sarkar, N. Kadakol. COVID-19: a re-
view. Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Mon-
aldi per le malattie del torace. 2020;90(2).
23
Meng, L., H. Qiu, L. Wan, et al. Intubation and ventilation
amid the COVID-19 outbreak: Wuhan’s experience. Anes-
thesiology. 132(6):1317–1332, 2020.
24
Setti, L., F. Passarini, G. De Gennaro, et al. Airborne
transmission route of COVID-19: why 2 meters/6 feet of
inter-personal distance could not be enough. Int. J. Envi-
ron. Res. Public Health 2020;17(8).
25
Shanafelt, T., J. Ripp, M. Trockel. Understanding and
addressing sources of anxiety among health care profes-
sionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020.
26
Tran, K., K. Cimon, M. Severn, C. L. Pessoa-Silva, and J.
Conly. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of trans-
mission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare
workers: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 7(4):e35797,
2012.
27
Tseng, J. Y., and H. Y. Lai. Protecting against COVID-19
aerosol infection during intubation. J. Chin. Med. Assoc.
83(6):582, 2020.
28
Turer, D. C., B. H. Jason. Intubation boxes: an extra layer
of safety or a false sense of security? STAT. 2020.
29
van Doremalen, N., T. Bushmaker, D. H. Morris, et al.
Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared
with SARS-CoV-1. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(16):1564–1567,
2020.
30
Wang, W., Y. Xu, R. Gao, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2
in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA.
323(18):1843–1844, 2020.
31
Zhang, R., Y. Li, A. L. Zhang, Y. Wang, and M. J. Mo-
lina. Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant
route for the spread of COVID-19. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 117(26):14857–14863, 2020.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with re-
gard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institu-
tional affiliations.
BIOMEDICAL
ENGINEERING
SOCIETY
MALONEY et al.