
Breast Cancer
1 3
potential triggers are administrated in the blood circula-
tion, either during general anesthesia induction or during
an operation. Only ten cases of perioperative KS have been
reported in the literature so far (Table1). In six of them,
KS was presented during general anesthesia induction or
immediately after that, but before skin incision. The rest
four cases were reported intraoperatively after skin inci-
sion by surgeons. Several triggers have been reported to
cause perioperative KS such as rocuronium, cefazoline,
gelofusine, midazolam, bupivacaine, latex and succi-
nylated gelatin. In 80% of the patients that experienced a
perioperative KS, there was no history of allergy or previ-
ous coronary disease (Type I).
Perioperative KS has presented as hypovolemic shock—
hypotension and tachycardia—during anesthesia induction
or within 60min after it. However, only in four out of ten
reported cases electrocardiographic alterations and rash were
initially manifested. In four more cases ACS was identified
by electrocardiographic alterations without clinical signs of
anaphylactic reaction. Finally, in two cases allergic reac-
tion was the first manifestation with a rash, but no initially
clinical signs of a coronary syndrome. Simultaneous clinical
signs of ACS and allergic reaction impose a serious diagnos-
tic problem and one out of ten patients died due to periop-
erative KS. All cases were managed according to ACS and
anaphylactic reaction therapeutic protocols.
KS in the operating room may prove serious and usually
presents as a hypovolemic shock. The key for successful
management of such a shock in an intubated patient is recog-
nizing the cause. This may prove to be challenging, as only
40% of patients develop a combination of ACS and allergic
clinical signs. Similar to what happened in our case, 20% of
patients with perioperative KS initially manifest an anaphy-
lactic reaction without ACS. Therefore, they are generally
treated for anaphylactic shock, as the pathophysiologic basis
of coronary occlusion in KS is based on hypersensitivity
reactions, that are resolved by corticosteroids and antihis-
tamines [17]. The main problem, however, exists in 40% of
patients with perioperative KS, that present ACS without
an initial anaphylactic reaction. These patients are treated
according to an ACS therapeutic protocol that is usually
not effective, because it actually does not deal with the real
cause of coronary occlusion [18]. The key for such patients
is raised suspicion by anesthesiologists and surgeons, with
continuous assessment of their whole body for clinical signs
of allergic reaction.
A possible algorithm for treating perioperative KS is shown
in Fig.2. When its anaphylactic component is present, all aller-
gic triggers should be removed, epinephrine, glucocorticoids
and antihistamines should be administered in combination to
high flow oxygen and fluid resuscitation [19]. When its coro-
nary syndrome component is present, a cardiology review and
administration of nitroglycerine, double antiplatelet medica-
tion (clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid) and calcium chan-
nel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) is advised [20]. Primary
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and ICU monitoring
are usually indicated Fig. (2).
In our case, patent blue V dye has triggered KS. Several
allergic reactions against patent blue V have been reported
in the literature, the incidence of which varies between 0.06
and 2.7%, with a mean value of 0.71%. Patent blue V allergic
reactions could vary from simple cutaneous manifestations to
cardiac arrest. Fortunately, the reported risk of severe allergic
reactions, that required vasopressors administration or surgery
interruption, remained extremely low and barely reached 0.1%
[21]. In addition, methylene blue has been proposed as a poten-
tial alternative to patent blue V, due to its comparable efficacy
in SLN identification, its lower cost and its decreased allergic
stimulation (below 0.5%). However, the possibility for cross
reactivity between these two dyes still exists [22]. Moreover,
super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles and indo-
cyanine green fluorescence (ICG) have demonstrated adequate
efficiency in SLN mapping in combination to a radio-isotope,
but their safety has still to be proved [23, 24]. Finally, the uti-
lization of a radio-isotope alone without a blue dye is another
proposed option that showed comparable SLN identification
rates, but required advanced surgical experience [25]. Nev-
ertheless, patent blue V has never been reported as a trigger
for KS.
Conclusion
KS is a combination of ACS and anaphylactic reaction that
rarely happens in the operating room. Diagnosis demands
raised suspicion by anesthesiologists and surgeons, when they
are facing an intraoperative shock without a clear cause, which
does not respond to usual therapeutic protocols. Multiple trig-
gers have been reported up to date and our case identified pat-
ent blue V for sentinel lymph node biopsy as a new one.